this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
675 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

84648 readers
5526 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Denixen@feddit.nu 18 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Since data centers will be run by nuclear power on-site in the future they will soon have both...

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

No they won't. Natural gas turbines baybee.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

The joke of the Grok AI is how it's generating power in one of the least cost efficient manners possible.

Musk is just burning a ton of short term capital to avoid lobbying Mississippi (fucking Mississippi, the most easy state to bend over a rail with lobbyists in the country) for a hard-line to the existing grid and some upgrades to capacity funded on the public dime.

That's what you get to do as a trillionaire. Make stupid business decisions and then dump the turd onto your investors when they want to invest in your lucrative network of federal Pentagon contracts.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 hours ago

Not if Trump keeps Hormuz fucked.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 13 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Why build a nuclear power plant with your data center if you could just get power from the grid and drive up everyone else's price too? It's cheaper for the data center operator.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Why build a nuclear power plant with your data center if you could just get power from the grid and drive up everyone else’s price too

The national grid has raw physical limits that many data centers already exceed.

Silicon Valley’s AI Boom Hits a Wall: Data Centers Are Built but Can’t Turn On

Power shortages and high costs are stalling new data centers, leaving the Bay Area behind faster-growing markets like Atlanta and Northern Virginia.

What do Atlanta and Virginia have access to that Silicon Valley lacks?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vogtle_Electric_Generating_Plant

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

...because they will suck the grid dry.

[–] Denixen@feddit.nu 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Because eventually the grid electricity costs too much. If you consume more than the community, then the prices will be astronomical. Then it is profitable to build a power plant. If they are generous, they could even sell some electricity to the community for a "reasonable" price.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Because eventually the grid electricity costs too much

Only a couple hundred mill a year per data center. Building a nuclear power plant costs several billion and isn't free to operate either, so it's not pure capex, there's still opex involved.

If you consume more than the community, then the prices will be astronomical

Prices rise for everyone so it becomes the community's problem as much as it becomes the data center's problem. The US in particular has three grids, so in reality, the community is either the western US, the eastern US, or Texas.

Then it is profitable to build a power plant.

Profitable over a decade or more maybe. The data center isn't guaranteed to be in operation for that long. You know those ~30-40k USD "graphics" cards they use? The ones that a single AI data center would likely have tens of thousands of, often even around 100k? They're used for about 3 years usually, often less. They become obsolete in that timeframe, just unable to compete with newer products in terms of both raw performance as well as efficiency. That's up to 3 billion dollars of GPUs every 3 years or less, per data center. Just a tiny economic downturn or people seriously realizing that this bubble is going to have to pop eventually and they'll have to stop running these data centers.

NPPs also usually take many years to complete. It took nearly two decades for the Finns to get Olkiluoto 3 running. Data centers need to be ready in a few years because in 5 years the AI craze could be over and they'll no longer be needed.

AI companies ain't gonna do shit for electricity generation if they're not forced to.

In my country, joining the grid or upgrading your circuit breaker has a one-time amperage-based fee (assuming you're close to the substation, otherwise it gets more expensive). I propose that for companies looking to consume huge amounts of electricity, there should also be a mandatory generation capacity increase fee that could be paid out to a nearby municipal power company that then uses it to build more power plants, or to some level of local government that could then sponsor building a power plant or 10.

Edit: Whoever downvoted me must think that data center operators are going to do anything out of the good of their hearts lol

[–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

People on lemmy downvote you just for disagreeing ALL the time, even if you make (as you just did) an informed and thoughtful reply. It’s honestly just as bad as Reddit with the downvote shit

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

The lemms are peculiar like that