this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29840 readers
2647 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not really an answer. If it were, his approvals would be a lot higher. The question is why, despite low approval rates, people still listen to him.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can use money to win elections even if people hate you. You can use some fake group to take credit for your political ads so people don't know the money comes from you.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, fake group makes positive political ads about you. Everyone still hates you. Why do they care about who you say they should vote for?

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're using the word "you" to refer to different people.

Okay, fake group makes positive political ads about you.

Here, "you" refers to a candidate that the hated person supports. (And by the way, usually in these cases, the political ads are not positive about you, but negative about your opponent.)

Everyone still hates you. Why do they care about who you say they should vote for?

Here, "you" suddenly refers to the hated person themselves. People hate this person which is why the message uses a fake group to hide where the message is coming from.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here, "you" refers to a candidate that the hated person supports

...huh? No, the candidate is the hated person. They're the same person.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article we're discussing was prompted by Rep. Thomas Massie getting defeated in the primary by the candidate that Trump supports, Ed Gallrein.

Massie is Trump's GOP rival because he supported releasing the Epstein files, so Trump supported Ed Gallrein.

The article goes on to list several other Republican politicians who have lost to the politician Trump backs.

I don't know how the topic could be any clearer. I can only assume you didn't read the article.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, thank you for the recap. I'm not sure what part of this is confusing you.

E: Ah yes, the classic "Everyone I don't understand is a troll!"

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago

Alright, I gave you the benefit of the doubt in your previous comment, but I think it's pretty clear at this point that you're trolling, so you're getting blocked.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 0 points 1 day ago

And why the spineless democrats won’t fucking do something. Anything. About him.