this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
568 points (97.5% liked)

me_irl

7739 readers
227 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 64 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People give it shit, but sometimes I kinda like brutalist architecture. KFC just about always sucks though.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For me it depends on several factors including cost, location, and purpose. An industrial sites main building? Yea brutalism is fine and fits nicely. Downtown's main transit terminal? I guess brutalist is better than no terminal but I'd rather see a more human friendly design.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Depending on the sq footage I'd love to live in that KFC look at all the balcony space.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Actual brutalist is thought to have been colorfully painted, IIRC.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What? Brutalist architecture is not from prehistory. We have actual examples of it. Also we have books written by the people that designed those buildings.

The concept of material honesty involves presenting the materials (usually concrete) without paint or processing so that its fundamental physical qualities like texture and color are apparent. To the young dissatisfied architects of the 1950s, this primitivism-inspired notion that raw concrete could make a beautiful surface by itself felt like an antidote to the sleek finishes of mainstream Mid-century modernism.

Raw, unfinished concrete or beton brut became one of the hallmarks of brutalism (it’s tempting to say that only concrete buildings are brutalist, but some of the earliest buildings to be labeled brutalist like the 1954 Hunstanton School by Alison and Peter Smithson incorporated much brick and steel.) Raw concrete was transformed from a utilitarian substance into a haute architectural statement by the aging Le Corbusier, who decades earlier had helped launch the Modern Movement with his Villa Savoye (1931) and manifesto Vers une architecture (1923). Between the end of WWII and his death in 1965, Le Corbusier explored the structural and aesthetic qualities of raw concrete. At the Unite d’Habitation in Marseilles (1952), he designed a rationalist “machine for living”, with apartments, shops, and communal space connected by “streets in the sky”, all within a structural grid of beton brut. At the Convent of La Tourette outside Lyon (1961), he explored the sculptural, plastic qualities of raw concrete, using this seemingly utilitarian substance to craft some of the most sensitive, poetic, and evocative spaces of the modern movement. Finally, at the Palace of Assembly in the master-planned Indian state capital of Chandigarh, Le Corbusier celebrated the structural power of concrete through huge, imposing columns.

Quoted from an AskHistorians thread on reddit where you can read more about it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/rcsjht/today_brutalist_buildings_seem_pretty_universally/

[–] mech@feddit.org 23 points 3 days ago

Sorry to say, you just wasted your time answering to a meme reference.

i think they were playing at the ancient greek temples. these were long considered to be the original "brute architecture", until it was recently found out that they were probably painted colorfully actually.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I swear i read it somewhere recently but i must be confusing it with something else...

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That was an ai meme pic good sir/madam

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and also gender isn't binary.