this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
174 points (98.3% liked)

politics

29941 readers
2038 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your first source doesn't specify how they're defining "Israeli" and whether they're including those with dual citizenship.

Your second source says

By contrast, demographic compilations such as World Population Review list state-level counts of Israelis (for example, roughly 32,071 in New York state and about 30,566 in California), which suggest far smaller base numbers if one focuses strictly on Israeli-born residents recorded in U.S. data [4].

It does not account for people applying for Israeli citizenship after being born in the U.S. meaning 32,000 is a lower end and likely a smaller percentage of the entire population of dual citizenship holders.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You and I are reading that part you quoted very differently. I'm reading it to say that the actual Israel-born people are far lower, because this number includes others, presumably dual citizens.

Regardless, you have provided zero sources, and these are the closest I've seen, and the number is far lower than 50%.

I also wouldn't personally include a dual citizen who has never lived in Israel. They allow any person of Jewish descent to apply for dual citizenship. It hardly makes you Israeli if you've never lived there, no matter what the paperwork says. I could write a document that says I'm a Moon person, but that doesn't mean that I'm actually a person from the moon.

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I also wouldn’t personally include a dual citizen who has never lived in Israel.

Statements like this make me think you're operating from an undisclosed bias. You wouldn't even blink if I called them "American". Your bias is especially suspicious when you close it with ridiculous statements like the following:

I could write a document that says I’m a Moon person, but that doesn’t mean that I’m actually a person from the moon.

We're not talking about moon people, and we're not talking about you. We're talking about two sovereign governments recognizing an individual as a citizen of that country.

Americans are currently being treated as second class citizens within our own country as numerous U.S. politicians prioritize the interests and needs of Israelis. Dual citizens to Israel are participants in this egregious behavior whether they like it or not.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Statements like this make me think you're operating from an undisclosed bias. You wouldn't even blink if I called them "American".

Because they live in America! If they've never lived in Israel, how are they Israeli? If you call someone a Russian who's never stepped foot in Russia and their family isn't from there then I'd call you crazy. Why does it change when it's Israel?

Americans are currently being treated as second class citizens within our own country as numerous U.S. politicians prioritize the interests and needs of Israelis.

Yes, and I'm not sure how that's relevant. If anything, it means we shouldn't just accept the idea these people are Israeli. It gives influence to Israel they don't deserve.

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because they live in America! If they’ve never lived in Israel, how are they Israeli?

Because they're a citizen of Israel.

It gives influence to Israel they don’t deserve.

... Israel has direct control over who is Israeli.

Again, you seem highly motivated to dismiss this without any apparent stake. What aren't you telling me about your biases here?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Again, you seem highly motivated to dismiss this without any apparent stake. What aren't you telling me about your biases here?

My bias is in reality, not politic. Politics influence reality, but they are not reality. Again, I can make a document that says I'm a citizen of wherever I want. Does that make it true? Even if that government agrees with it, does that make it real?

If they aren't part of the culture of that group (no, Israel culture does not equal judeism), how does it make sense to describe them as a member of that culture? If you actually immigrate to another country many of the people will never see you as fully a member of that culture, because you didn't grow up immersed in it.

You continously saying "you're biased" to not engage with what I'm saying is annoying. Everyone is biased. You're biased to think that any claim of citizenship to Israel makes them actually a part of Israeli society. If you accept every claim every government makes then sure, they're Israeli. If you think that they actually need to be a part of the culture, they aren't. Governments agree on stuff all the time that the people don't agree with. A government document doesn't create reality.

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

My bias is in reality

Try again. How does this affect you directly?