this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
379 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29969 readers
2310 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They may not have the gavels yet, but House Democrats are laying the groundwork for a number of investigations into Donald Trump should they win control of Congress in November.

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif. — who’s set to chair the House Oversight Committee in a Democratic majority — told MS NOW that his team is “already preparing and gearing up.”

“We’ve got a team on Epstein, we have a team on [Trump] family corruption, we have a team on DHS and ICE,” Garcia said. “Those teams are actively working on preparation, letters, research.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If they want to be trusted again they should investigate Bidens ignoring of the Leahy laws as well. we need to be a nation of laws again and that means going after everyone who breaks the law whether they are in your party or in office or not.

Everyone of every party who has supported this genocide belongs impeached, in shackles, and in jail. Our standing laws say so.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I completely agree, but I want to emphasize something. That "AS WELL" is putting in a lot of work in this sentence man...

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You are insane if you think Trump will see any repercussions. At all.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

You're the problem. Politicians are lazy and greedy. If you tell them that you expect them to ignore us, and we'll accept it, then that's what they'll do, and go back to their favorite pastime, insider trading.

Tell them that you expect them to punish all of MAGA, or they will suffer the same fate. They are either on our side or they aren't, and we're keeping track.

That's what you should be posting. Not cowardly excuses.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump is 100% going to pardon himself. And I have little confidence that the courts will stop him. They will talk about history and tradition when it suits them, but I can totally see them making an exception for yet another unprecedented action.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Even if Trump doesn't pardon himself, the next asshole will pardon him to "help heal the rift between two camps".

No president, ever, has been held accountable for various corruptions and war crimes.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't pardon yourself. No president had done it, there is no precedent, we don't have to accept it because a monster like Trump says so. Period.

And if he does manage to take away all options for punishing him? He will spawn dozens of assassins who will be gunning for him at every moment for the rest of his life. He will have to fear snipers, poison, inside jobs, rpgs, bombs, etc. every minute of his life, which will be terrifying for a coward like him. And hopefully, someone will succeed.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No president has done it and it certainly was not the intent of the pardon power. But it is not explicitly forbidden. Hopefully if he tries it it gets ruled against, but after SCOTUS made that horrible ruling about presidential immunity I have little confidence.

Trump getting away with a pardon and then getting assassinated is, in my mind, one of the worst scenarios. It martyrs him in the eyes of his cult. At the same time, it sets out legal precedent for a future fascist/authoritarian to pardon themselves for misdeeds in office. He's an old man anyway and won't last much longer. Let's hope it does not come to pass.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

There's no such thing as a MAGA Martyr. They are Sociopaths by definition, so they don't care about anyone else beyond their basic utility. Once they're dead, their utility ends, and they are forgotten about.

They tried to make a martyr out of Charlie Kirk, and it has already ended. They bring him up now and then, but mostly just to disparage Ds for "celebrating" his death. They don't really miss Kirk. Even his wife has moved on.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look into Schmuck Schumer, too. He only cares about Israel and Insider Trading, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if he was MAGA bought. He couldn't have been less effective if he was working for MAGA.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

what kills me about Schumer et al is that i was always taught that dual loyalty is an antisemitic trope because it's founded on essentialism. The idea that someone might hold a loyalty to another country over their own based on their ethnicity is an unjust assumption, and it hurts American Jews (and their communities, and by extension yourself, as a member of their community) because as a group they really just want to get by, same as anyone else. They are our neighbors and our friends, and they want whats good for their homeland just like you and me. Jewish Americans are just Americans who happen to be Jewish.

But it seems like everyone in the ruling class has decided that actually dual loyalty is part of being Jewish, and that actually you're the antisemitic one for pointing it out, and that furthermore antizionist jews are antisemitic for their unjewish behavior.