this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
446 points (96.7% liked)

politics

31105 readers
1830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive article https://archive.is/hXQTC

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It seems to me that Kelly is a centrist who stands for nothing in particular. Why have you decided to support him? Sure being a navy pilot and a member of Nasa is cool, but we dont need cool, we need a dem who will take a stand on the issues for once. Issue support is what we need to win, not some cult of personality.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But have you considered how electable a zionist white thumb is in Trump's America? /s

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

AOC voted to continue arming Pissrael, so...

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You're right, she is such a zionist I am sure AIPAC will help fund her race for president. 🙄

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Strawman arguments are a weak response to being presented with facts you don't like being reminded of.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I presented a counter factual. You show an instance where she "supported" Isreal and I show you a pattern of Isreal hating her guts. But I guess large trends like that aren't relevant now?

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I show you a pattern of Isreal hating her guts

Uh... where, exactly, did you do that?

Also, voting to send millions of dollars worth of weaponry isn't "supported" with quotes, it's just supported. No quotes necessary.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He's not my favorite. But he'd be a strong candidate.