politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Graham Platner is a complete OP. The least genuine person in world history. His entire campaign and all his words are picked by "Fight Agency" as their personal pet project to show that they can get even mass murdering Nazis elected by American "leftists".
In WORLD history?! Lol come on.
He was pointing out Israel’s atrocities before it was popular. For that alone he would have my vote.
Even if he is the next Fetterman (very possible), Susan Collins would be out and hopefully it will encourage more to run on a progressive platform.
He was murdering brown people at that time in the same way Israel is doing now.
I don't know which would be sadder: That you actually believe what you wrote, or that you don't.
Sing your song, little birdie
Just like they got that Nazi Zohran Mamdani elected?
Zohran did not go on five tours to kill brown people and get a Nazi tattoo as commemoration.
You missed the point. You should engage it head on, otherwise your argument is just weak and it looks like you’re dancing around it. The question is why is the Fight Agency group that lined up to elect Mamdani also lining up to elect Platner if he’s actually a Nazi? You all fawn over their pick Mamdani. You might want to try to see what they see.
To show that their consultancy firm can get you to support literally anyone if they coach them their fake persona and say studied lines they mean nothing of.
Did Zohran go on several your voluntarily because of the "thrill" and get a totenkopf tattoo? Because if he didn't. He isn't a fucking nazi
You missed the point. You should engage it head on, otherwise your argument is just weak and it looks like you’re dancing around it. The question is why is the Fight Agency group that lined up to elect Mamdani also lining up to elect Platner if he’s actually a Nazi?
You are saying people need to engage the point head on and then dodging the point