this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
1279 points (98.9% liked)

Political Memes

11998 readers
2775 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Once again, socialism is the public ownership of the means of production. Universal healthcare, subsidized healthcare, government-assisted healthcare, whatever name you want to give it, has nothing to do with whether a government is socialist. Public healthcare can be offered by virtually any type of government.

Like many people on this platform, you're confusing the words social and socialist. They are not the same thing. As defined above, a social democrat is not a socialist. Government programs that provide assistance to the population are not inherently socialist programs; they are welfare programs.

You are not advocating for public ownership of the means of production. You are advocating for welfare programs that benefit the population under a democratic government. I genuinely do not understand why so many people on this platform have such a difficult time grasping this distinction.

So I will simply leave you with the below quote.

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Public healthcare cannot be offered by a fully capitalist government. I would argue welfare itself could be deemed socialist. Production also benefits the population btw.

Also, jesus christ man. what is that quote?

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most developed and developing countries on Earth have public healthcare systems and are still fully capitalist. Nearly all European countries are examples of this. Even the United States has forms of public healthcare. People often forget that America already provides government-funded healthcare through programs such as Medicare and Medicaid; one simply has to qualify, and tens of millions of Americans do.

Once again, please listen to what I'm saying: welfare programs are not socialism. The words "social" and "socialism" have two entirely different meanings. A country can be capitalist, communist, a dictatorship, or a monarchy and still offer social programs, more accurately described as welfare programs. The existence of those programs does not determine the underlying economic system.

The quote is from Billy Madison, which kind of gives you away. You're probably too young to even be having this discussion, let alone offering an opinion on the matter.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No country on Earth is fully capitalist. Also, I don't think a country can be communist. Kinda goes against the definition.

Dawg, "Billy Madison" is 30 years old. You gotta be atleast twice the voting age to have watched it when it released.