this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
271 points (98.2% liked)

politics

30600 readers
2047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US House voted Tuesday to pass a measure to enact year-round Daylight Saving Time across the country, springing Congress forward into an issue that has long stumped lawmakers and spurred impassioned pleas by parents, farmers and others with sharply divergent views.

It will now head to the Senate for approval before going to the president for his signature — though its chances in the upper chamber remain unclear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I don't know the page you're taking about, but I found this map years ago. It changed me from being a lifelong "make DST permanent" stan to stumping for permanent standard time.

People on the westernmost sides of time zones would get absolutely hosed in the mornings under permanent DST.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

This makes no sense? I could care less that I get to see the sun on my way to sit at a desk at 7am.

I want to have the sun after I'm off work to enjoy my life. DST is way better

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My question exactly.

Under ST in the winter it’s dark when I get up and go to work, and it’s dark when I come home. Under DT, it would be the same.

In the summer, it’s sunny when I’m still trying to sleep in the morning and still sunny when I’m trying to sleep at night. Under ST it would be the same.

The only difference would be in spring and fall, when the transition time would shift earlier or later.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I always hate it when I'm waking up to an alarm.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Those lines need to be adjusted away from state borders. Those also cause problems.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Time zone lines tend to follow state borders.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Why is that. A problem? You have to have the line somewhere. It's better if it goes along an already existing imaginary line. If they didn't line up, you would need to remember sets of arbitrary lines instead of 1.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

While I agree those lines aren't ideal, any other system would make it very hard to know when to adjust your watch up or down

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I’m just saying that the natural borders of light don’t correlate with the borders of the state In some cases really skew the time.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think the was the same/similar map that I saw. It also let you put in a date and it would show you was times sun rise/set would roughly be.

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

It’s so weird that Hawaii is listed here because they don’t observe DST and they probably won’t jump ahead an hour just to sync up times with us.