this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
1196 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

12196 readers
3196 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's not even more money yet. This is just the same city funds being redistributed to areas where it can be useful.

Meaning ANY Mayor could have done this, they chose not to.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This is just the same city funds being redistributed to areas where it can be useful.

You're mad! Mad, I say! It'll never work!

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Welllll one of the ways he did it was by delaying pension fund payments. So it's not all roses.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago

That pension system is nuts btw.

These savings would be achieved by smoothing out a bizarre feature of the city’s pension payment schedule instituted in 2010, which had required accelerating payments through to fiscal year 2032, at which point the payments would turn negative and the pension funds would return money to the City over a seven-year period. The $8.2 billion “contribution cliff” created by this structure was not reasonable fiscal policymaking. The proposed change unwinds this drop off by smoothing payments over an additional five years. It does not—and cannot—affect the pensions owed to City workers or impact the City’s ability to meet those commitments.

Source: https://fiscalpolicy.org/explainer-the-proposed-restructuring-of-new-york-city-pension-payments