this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
317 points (99.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41002 readers
3561 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I can't tell if this is one of those satire sites.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

It's real. Published one day ago:

https://baptistnews.com/article/men-only-gyms-seek-to-protect-christian-men-from-lust/

The site isn't what you might think, though. The article is funny, but also a surprisingly good read:

According to the gym’s website, “There was a season of his life marked by homelessness, addiction and spiritual emptiness.” In another video, he admits, “I had a pornography addiction for almost 20 years.”

Mitch Parsons, founder of Youth Group for Men and Remnant Men in Denver, had a similar experience. “I quit four gyms before I built one,” he says on the Remnant Gym website. “I realized the problem wasn’t the gym. It was that no one had built what I actually needed, or what I wanted.”

I know its easy to laugh, but a "porn addiction" can be serious shit. Terry Crews gave some great talks about how it fucked up his life in all sorts of ways.

Also, it's healthily skeptical:

Also, despite how often Parsons mentions having nakedness shoved in his face at the gyms in Denver, it’s unclear what he means by that. Gym policies across Denver require their members to wear shirts at all times. And Denver public indecency laws prohibit exposing one’s genitals in public.

This is what Hambrecht and Parsons are doing with their male-only gyms. They’re spreading conspiracies about morality and traditional marriage that cast women as dangerous. They’re promoting men rising up as warrior-kings who are ready to fight evil, and they’re getting rid of women who they claim are ruining everything.

It's got some good writeups, and spicy ones:

https://baptistnews.com/article/why-do-we-keep-sounding-the-alarm/

https://baptistnews.com/article/in-3-charts-white-christian-nationalists-love-of-ice-and-concentration-camps/

As the empirical evidence for the threat white Christian nationalism presents to pluralistic democracy has mounted over the past decade, various insider defenders of conservative white Christianity — and even some mainstream white Christian theologians — have alleged the term is simply a cudgel. Those who qualify as Christian nationalists on public opinion surveys, they argue, only want to see a role for their faith in the public square....

Donald Trump is an abuser. He is an adjudicated rapist and predator. Donald Trump is a grifter. He is a well-known con man who gets away with the con because so many don’t want to talk about it. Donald Trump is a liar unlike any liar most of us ever have known. And there are enormous consequences to his perpetual lying. Donald Trump is literally the most dangerous man in the world, and you want to label me with “Trump Derangement Syndrome” for saying that.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Porn addiction is not a thing. It's a made up concept slung around by christofascist chuds to hide their actual problem, which is that they have no self control and no respect for others' boundaries.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean people can get addicted to anything, but it's not the moral hazard they make it out to be.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

No, that's not how addiction is defined. Dependency is not addiction. You aren't addicted to food or air. What "porn addiction" proponents are trying to convince you of is that any use of porn constitutes an addiction for which the only reasonable treatment is to stop viewing porn entirely. This is a tactic designed to both control and frustrate men to make them easier to manipulate. It's a shame collar put around their necks to leash them. It's not scientifically valid, they know that, and they do not care. Don't mince words with me please.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you can get food addiction I think you can get porn addiction.

I get the distinction you're trying to make between behavioral addictions and chemical (? I forget the name) ones like alcohol addiction. But behavioral addictions by definition can be almost anything. I'd wager a good portion of us are addicted to our phones, for example.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You may have a point there, but consider this: Absolutely none of the people behind this "porn addiction" meme are qualified professionals in a position to make that distinction. Their disingenuous and manipulative nature is obvious as shit. You can argue about whether or not some form of porn addiction exists all day, but it doesn't matter whether or not it actually exists. They don't care how real it is or isn't. It's a useful tool for them to spread fascism, and that's reason enough to throw it in the garbage.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I didn't disagree but that doesn't mean people don't get addicted to porn.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You're right, my opinion doesn't mean people don't get addicted to porn. The consensus of the scientific community carries a bit more weight though, and that's what's behind my opinion. Believe whatever you want, but beware the ideological company you keep.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13371739/ porn addiction isn't a term that has been adopted by science but problematic porn use or PPU is and it's real. They did find that people from religious backgrounds called themselves addicts but weren't always actually consuming a lot of porn.

I say this as someone who doesn't have an issue with porn or people watching it. I fully agree that Christianity makes way too big a deal about porn and masturbation, but people def have real problems with their porn usage and not because it's morally wrong to look at porn.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

Impossible to tell... The dark side clouds all.