this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
342 points (87.3% liked)

politics

31138 readers
2023 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Voting / politics is a chess game. Sometimes you have to plan ahead and work from behind and sacrifice some positions. Refusing to play the pieces you have (even from a losing position) is just letting the opponent win.

If there’s a better primary challenger than Newsom, a Progressive candidate, I’m all for them. I want them. I don’t want Newsom, but if it comes down to him or another trump clone, Newsom is good enough to at least keep us from societal collapse.

Refusing to vote for him because he’s not a perfect fit is just giving the enemy a win. See: all those who refused to vote for Harris and now we have trump.

There’s no viable 3rd party candidate. Probably never will be.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lmao i saw this same comment in 2016

Just save this post and you can use it every 8 years until we are killing each other for clean water

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Ok. So how do we “abandon the duopoly?” Honest question. If you have a viable suggestion, I am all for it. Because refusing to vote is what trump wants you to do.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • abandons Trans people
  • proudly attacks the homeless
  • backs the neoliberal policies that got us to where we are today
  • does performative actions, instead of actual policy

...not a perfect fit...

I think your view of "perfect" might be different than most people

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok then let trump’s successor win.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, maybe the Democrats could put up a candidate that the voters want, for a change.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that’s not happening. So now what?

[–] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then we're fucked. Start looking at parties and organizations that are doing something to help out, instead of simping for a party that is actively supporting the fascists.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So to use another analogy, I’d rather “tread water” (vote for the lesser of two evils) in this river of raw sewage we’re stuck in, rather than “drown” in it (let greater evil win by voting against the lesser evil).

At least while treading water, we can still try to find someone who is doing something to help out.

For fuck’s sake, I’m not “simping for Newsom,” I’m just aware that he’s better than trump. At least we can see the horizon with him.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Newsome was "treading water", I'd be fine with him. But he's not. He's attacking destroying the lives of homeless people. Throwing Trans people to the wolves. He's not "Lesser Neutral", he's "Lesser Evil".

How are we going to find something to help out with the Democrats actively fighting against us?

You are simping. You are defending a person that would throw you under the bus in a heartbeat. Yes he's better than Trump, but that doesn't make him acceptable. Continuing to accept people like him is how we ended up with Trump.