this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
433 points (96.2% liked)
Political Memes
9573 readers
2490 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Still can’t admit your strawman argument is invalid.
When pushed, you refused to understand how governments work.
How can someone disagree with a meme and embody it? If you have a point to make, please - do.
Here’s chatgpt’s summary when I asked it to parse the sentence
Not a straw man. I presented a picture of Liberals giving Fascists the gun. You argued Biden should have done that. More inability to listen.
We’ll try again. Liberals handed fascists the gun. Should they have done so?
Keep fighting those Leftists.
ChatGPT sure is helpful.
Explains the ChatGPT dunnit.
Did they? Was it a big gun? Did they hand it to them with two hands, or was it like they took the gun out of the cardboard box they kept it in and put it on the table for the fascists to pick up? What were Liberals wearing? See if ChatGPT knows.
Apparently!
Is this you admitting you were wrong?
Is that why you've resorted to pretending not to know what a metaphor is? The problem with people acting the fool, is that they look like fools. That's fine if they're being silly, not if they want people to take their position seriously.
Interesting you understood what the metaphor was up until now. Or were you pretending to understand up until now? Given you have only just learned you didn't understand, would you like to read through the thread again and try listen to what was said? Perhaps you can use GPT to explain it to you.
I have no idea. Was there a point being argued?
The problem with playing the fool. Anyone can read me saying:
And
My point was clear and stated many times. You could have read that if you wanted.
For once something we agree on. Can we just leave it at that? A positive note of agreement between us? For my own part, I'm happily quoting this nonsense at the start of the thread. Here's the culmination of your position:
And
Well you must admit it was highly effective.
What was?
Exactly! And well played.
Again, what was?
What was the moment, do you think, that it went so wrong for you?
Was it the beginning when you were waxing lyrical about Liberalism being for freedom? Was it when you saw the reality of Liberals handing your freedom away to Fascists? Was it when you said that Liberals should hand your freedom away to fascists?
Notice that you can't blame Leftists, they never held the gun, and the Liberals wouldn't give it to them.
Something sparked this delirium: pretending not to know what a metaphor is, pretending to not know what happened. This couldn't have been where you thought the conversation was going to go. What was it, do you think?