this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
404 points (97.2% liked)

politics

25875 readers
3432 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

you need to stop using phrases like that, it’s going to be turned around on you like defund the police

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Message: Defund the police!

Your response: stop using that phrase. It's not specific enough and too easily weaponized by the right.

Message: reallocate police funding to mental health response teams. Transfer duties from the police to medical professionals.

Your response: the left sucks at messaging. We need powerful slogans that capture the imagination, not wonkish policy positions.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

don’t ascribe fictional quotes to me, buddy

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

If they were quotes they would have quotation marks...

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nah it’s a pretty clean message, we are going to consume all of their resources, and put up walls so high they can never accumulate that much again. Like God crumbling the tower of Babel.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also, whoever shot and murdered a healthcare CEO in cold blood last year got more praise from the general public than basically anything the Democratic party has done in the last ten years, so yeah, that comment seems pretty out of touch with public sentiment

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Bipartisan support too 🤣🫡

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Mark my words, it will be turned around as an example of “leftist blood thirst”

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

That will happen anyway, because it a core component of fascism. It does not matter what is said, it will be abused by the fascists.

The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies. … However, the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.

Umberto Eco, Ur-Fascism

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Did you ever think they probably should be scared at this point? Fear is a great way to regulate behavior without the need for action. The fascist taught me that.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They'll do that no matter what, so we may as well do the right thing in the meantime.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I’m someone they consider a leftist even tho I’m really a classical liberal with libertarian biases and guns. I do want to Tale of Two Cities them. They are correct, and I’m not even hungry yet. Just disenfranchised.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I’d probably eat the rich literally if it produced the right reaction: have a Martha Stewart style cooking show all about it: it would get great ratings!