this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
807 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25875 readers
3364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Proposed legislation behind the impending US government shutdown contains provisions that would ban federal funding for transgender adults, as well as youngsters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 202 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes, but also maybe take the threat against trans people seriously? like, Trump just said he wants to ban trans healthcare. it seems like that should also be a big deal. saying that everything is a distraction from the Epstein files has become a distraction from some serious shit.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The point is that the Epstein files has been pretty much the only thing to bring cracks in Republican support for Trump.

Everyone who is upset at this news on Trans health care already know Trump is a useless piece of shit. His base on the other hand will probably cheer this on.

So driving that wedge that is the Epstein files is imperative if we want to chip away at his approval ratings and hope we can salvage this shit in next year's midterms (I know, a stretch).

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It just feels a lot like “oh, trans people? Fuck em. Show me the list!”

Like I really don’t see how it helps anything to post it here. Go talk to conservatives about it instead of posting it in threads where everyone already knows about it.

Because calling it a distraction when he is actively trying to kill me and people that I care about really just feels like y’all don’t give a shit about us either.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Personally I don't get that impression of, "Oh, trans people? Fuck em." It's more, "Strike them at their pressure points because look at this kind of fucked up shit they're doing!"

You never know who the lurkers are, and it refreshes minds of our side to go out and remain on message. It's useful to me in that regards.

Sadly it's just a reality that the people we need to convince already support what he's doing on this issue.

[–] f1error@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Has anyone tried telling trump he wasn’t rich enough to be on Epstein’s list.

Not that it matters when he’s dismantling our country.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

good to know the forced death of people like me is just a distraction to you.

The other stuff is also bad–the fascism and stuff–but it might be useful here.