this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
254 points (99.2% liked)

Political Memes

12295 readers
2268 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip -3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Is that expected of paleontologists?

I mean really, honestly most people didn't give a shit about Epstein until someone suocided him. And even then, gave very few shits until earlier this year.

Like I'd expect that bar for politicians, celebrities, public figures...people who have money to begin with and staff to tell them that this person shouldn't be associated with...I don't know if I can set that same expectation on academics reaching out for funding from somebody whose been known to fund academia.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You don't think the line should be drawn at pedophilia?

What are we doing here? We're wholesale signing off on supporting a prolific and dangerous pedophile?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Epstein wasn't a household name until his death; even post "suicide" and the revelations about his pedo empire it's still not common for people to extensively research the background of strangers they're cold-calling, and Epstein had more than enough money to SEO away reports of his conviction.

If you didnt know him or weren't told directly about him being a pedo, it was unlikely that you could have known about him at the time. Most of the folks in the epstein files did know him though - and it's pretty easy to check which group someone falls into.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Epstein wasn't a household name until his death

I would say his name became pretty well known before his death. I'd say more like 2018 with the Miami Herald exposé.

Less known but still pretty public was Giuffre in 2011 with the allegations against the Andrew formerly known as a prince. It was a pretty big story for the UK royal family. Maybe not "household" level though.

Epstein's arrest was also pretty big news, though yes it was only a month or so before his death, but I would have to say he was known by a pretty significant number of people by this point, definitely household name by the time of arrest.

After his death is when the conspiracy theories went all over the place, but I wouldn't equate that to his being a household name.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry, I'm not quite sure what you're saying here.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 47 minutes ago

You said he wasn't a household name until he died.

I would not agree with that, it was definitely earlier enough to cause issues, including reopening investigations, long before he died.

Thats all.