this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
188 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30773 readers
2192 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 71 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We're all calling the old custom 747 -- the one with all the gov-spec classified countermeasures, the one that's cost us $2 billion, the one that's full of real human civilians -- we're calling that the "decoy plane" now.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 38 points 23 hours ago

The fake president is on his fake plane going to fake meetings. He's not in charge.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Hey good point actually, at least the sacrificial plane was a real "Air Force One" in its capabilities and defenses. Unlike the gold tchotchke plane. And I like thinking how uncomfortable the military plane probably was. The fact no attack happened suggests someone knew he wasn't on the sacrificial plane. Hegseth probably texted a friend about it. Loser Bone Spurs showing his true cowardice.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 17 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The fact no attack happened suggests someone knew he wasn't on the sacrificial plane.

If you are the Iranian military, would you want your enemy to be led by Mr Trump or someone else?

[–] Cherries@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe someone else wouldn't bomb elementary schools. Sure it's a maybe, but maybe that's a worthy dice roll.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Have you seen the republicans, the would bomb and rape elementary schools

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Haha, you thinking maybe there was no threat and someone just made a bet they could get him to cower in a lunch carrier?

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I saw a take that was just “he has no attention span, the only way to get him to care is to make it feel engaging and exciting”

And thus the idea of the attack was crafted to get him re-invested in the war. To make him see it as important and not just an annoying thing he wants to go away. And… given that kegseth went with him… yah… feels like a stunt.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

The C32A, the plane Trump actually went on, pretty much has all of the same stuff as the VC25A. It's just based on Boeing 757, which is a single aisle airliner.