this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
477 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31112 readers
2327 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 76 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Imagine growing up knowing you wanted to be in the FBI to be part of a crack team working on real crimes and then....getting assigned a task like this?

I mean, what the fuck?

[–] Smug_Marmot@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

"Agent, we have a new assignment for you."

"Yes, sir, what will it be this time? Another terrorist group trying to ship in illegal weaponry?"

"Uh, well... It's more related to the internet."

"Ah, I see, sir. Will this be like the time I infiltrated that human trafficking communication network?"

"No... Some people on the internet, uh, hurt Mr. Patel's feelings..."

"No problem sir, I will take them... wait, what did you say?"

"You need to create a twi... an 'X' account and reply to those who say mean things to Mr. Patel."

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I imagine half the people who grow up wanting to be in the FBI would have been caught up in the propaganda/entertainment shows like 24 growing up. The run around shoot bad guys and stop nuclear bombs from being snuck into the country before they blow up (insert large city here). Unless they were really into forensics and like lab work, but there can't be to many people out there that love science and think the FBI would be the best place to study/learn cool new things

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless they care about things like countering human trafficking and get into it because they legitimately want to stop evil people and save lives or rescue innocents...

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Ah good point, I was thinking that fell under DHS.

[–] Smug_Marmot@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

but there can’t be to many people out there that love science and think the FBI would be the best place to study/learn cool new things

On a serious note, in the past few decades, the government has gone to great lengths to attract people like that into these agencies. In the earlier 2000's, the government realized it had a significant lack of talent compared to the private sector when it came to technology and especially cyber security. The government has a lot of close connections with the private sector, but also worked to directly attract talent too including allowing more competitive salaries or benefits.

Years ago there were a ton of articles talking about how the FBI had wanted to do away with the federal drug testing requirements when it came to marijuana, because it prevented them from recruiting certain groups.