this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
999 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

12562 readers
2727 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 83 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Most governments with the Communist in the name, are just state run capitalists

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago
  • 'Communist' party

  • has nothing to do with communism

  • 'Democratic' party

  • has nothing to do with democracy

Republican fits too, but Democratic is more obvious.

[–] schwifty_squanch@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yes... China is state capitalist... Meanwhile, here in the Burger Reich, corporations routinely get bailouts from Uncle Sam paid for by the taxes of the workers.

If China is State Capitalist, what do you consider the USA?

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fake communist societies being state capitalists doesn't preclude other societies from being state capitalist.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, if the response to "this system doesn't work" is "neither does yours" then we agree that neither system works, and need to find one that does. And if no system will ever work, we need to find some way to live safely and securely without systems.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And if no system will ever work, we need to find some way to live safely and securely without systems.

one just has to look to anthropology, we know what works, the Khalari Bushmen lasted 100,000 years, The Australian Aborigine lasted 60,000 gears, we won't last another 50.

We won't go back voluntarily but we will go back

for example

https://aeon.co/essays/why-inequality-bothers-people-more-than-poverty

Up until then, it was widely believed that hunter-gatherers endured a near-constant battle against starvation, and that it was only with the advent of agriculture that we began to free ourselves from the capricious tyranny of nature.

When in 1964 a young Canadian anthropologist, Richard Borshay Lee, conducted a series of simple economic input/output analyses of the Ju/’hoansi as they went about their daily lives, he revealed that not only did they make a good living from hunting and gathering, but that they were also well-nourished and content. Most remarkably, his research revealed that the Ju/’hoansi managed this on the basis of little more than 15 hours’ work per week. On the strength of this finding, the anthropologist Marshall Salinas in Stone Age Economics (1972) renamed hunter-gatherers ‘the original affluent society’.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Liked your comment, stalked you, liked your comment history. How do I permanently follow you on Lemmy?

[–] architect@thelemmy.club -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We are animals. This will never happen.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Anthropological evidence suggests otherwisee

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

that's the only kind there is

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

If China is State Capitalist, what do you consider the USA?

State capitalist with no tooth. The enemy of your enemy isn't always your friend, stop defending the bad of the other camp just because you hate the bad from this camp.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Fascist with some vestigial elements of liberalism (or maybe liberalism rapidly descending into fascism if you're feeling generous). In state capitalism, the state controls the corporations. In fascism, the corporations control the state.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

going to quibble just because fascism is a reaction against a threat of a worker's movement.

That has been totally crushed in the US currently.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are missing class context. In China, the working class control the state, and through them the corporations. In the US, the capitalist control the state and the corporations, and do fascism to prevent the workers from gaining any control over anything.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How exacty is the working class controlling the state in China?

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The CPC is made up of members of the working class, who both elect higher representatives and vote directly on numerous issues. Any member of the working class can join the CPC, provided they agree to the system of centralized democracy that governs the party.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By that definition most 'western' countries are controlled by the working class too, with the addition that literally everybody in the working class gets to vote.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except in practice, when rich people are allowed to participate in the political process, they use their wealth to influence everything. So in the West, we technically have democracies, but in practice we actually have oligarchies where the entire system is set up to empower the wealthy and prevent the working class from gaining real power. Since China doesn’t allow the capitalists to participate in politics, their democracy remains in the hands of the people.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be extremely naive to think that the wealth doesn't influence Party Politics in China.

And there is no democracy in China. Electoral Democracy is one of the core pillars of Democracy itself, without it, it simply isn't democratic. For that to be true in China there would have to be elections where everyone gets to vote.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering that China routinely passes death sentences to people for corruption, I think it is fair to say that money influences Chinese politics significantly less than Western politics.

Everyone does get to vote in China: https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/how-do-elections-in-china-work

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, and those definitely aren't just Ji Jinpings political enemies that he is eliminating, as is usual in an authoritarian state.

And yeah, no. That's not what Electoral Democracy is. Or when was the last time a different party with different ideas was elected to Power in China?

Honestly, the lengths tankies go to in order to convince themselves China is a Democracy is insane. Literally 1984 DoubleThink.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to think that too, then I started learning things. Always remember that the capitalists want you to think communism is the worst possible thing. Your opinions on China are based almost entirely on anti-communist propaganda designed to protect the oligarchies of the West.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

then I started learning things

Apparently not about democracy. I'll ask again, when was the last time China held a general election which allowed opposition parties?

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democracy isn't defined by allowing opposition parties, it is defined by how closely the government follows the will of the people. And socialist governments almost universally are significantly more aligned with their people than capitalist states. China's CPC has a 90+% satisfaction rating, most US governments never get above 40%. Capitalist states have the illusion of democracy, socialist states actually have it.

[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's impressive how confidently incorrect you are.

https://youtu.be/O7LvhSQ5Te4?is=TmbZ8L83lGaEz3HZ

A good video on what constitutes Democracy, of which multiparty elections absolutely is a core part.

But this will be it for me. I wish you well in life.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it's just not the case. Demos - people. Kratos - rule. The rules of the people, Democracy. Parties are not a necessary mechanism for establishing the rules of the people. All that's necessary is for the rules to be written based on input from the people and to meet the needs of the people providing that input.

The problem with liberal democracies is that they allow parties like "The party that thinks we should kill all non-white people" as though it's a legitimate party and they protect their right to free speech but they don't allow "the party that thinks we should repress the violence of white supremacists" because that goes against freedom of speech. This is why the US government protected the rights of the KKK to parade before and after they committed lynchings and then said "well the lynchings are a local problem that the police have to handle", meanwhile the police are literally klansmen. But also why the US government blackballed all communism sympathizers in TV, Hollywood, radio, journalism, and literature, killed a number of communists, and passed laws banning communists from ever holding office.

Because the reality is that party politics in liberal democracies are punch and judy shows that keep the population engaged in electoralism while the same rich white racist slave owning pedophile rapists that founded the country continue to run the country 250 years later.

Meanwhile, if the billionaires in China tried to start a political party to convince the people to vote for them, they'd be hanged.

Because in China the rules are of the people, and in liberal democracies the rules are of the wealthy.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And it's impressive how tenaciously you adhere to a definition of democracy that most benefits the capitalist class.

Here's a good video on how the US is NOT a democracy (and democracy in general). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srfeHpQNEAI

I also wish you well.

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you... do you really think china isnt capitalist?

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

So why doesn't the US adopt their system, which is doing much better?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean of all the things to criticize China about, a planned economy should be one to avoid.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, using a planned economy to corner the market is such an amazing capilitistic accomplishment.