this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
337 points (87.7% liked)
Political Memes
12522 readers
3212 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'll happily vote for the Dems candidates if stop supporting genocide and start doing what the people want. If they want to play republican-lite again they can lose again. If you dont like that, centrists and zionists, I dont particularly care. But the dems will earn my vote from now on. They have taught us all that if we dont demand, they will do zero to represent us-- they will just cash bribe checks. No more of that.
Why would they listen to your demands, you just said you don't vote. Your demands literally don't matter anymore.
Why would they listen to you? You will vote for them anyway. How hard is it for dems to not be war criminals?
Because here in the modern world, we have primaries.
You will still complain when people would not vote for the popular candidate
It sucks that the invented reality you came up with hurt your feelings, but that's not my problem.
You mean the thing that got rigged in 2016 or the thing where the popular candidate got ratfucked in 2020 or the thing that we didnt have in 2024?
Or do you mean the thing we had in 2012 and 2008 with a candidate who ran on a faux-leftist platform he then abandoned? Or do you mean the thing in 2004 where mainstream media and the DNC conspired to run the popular anti-war candidate into the ground over a nothing-burger or the thing in 2000 where the democratic party showed it was completely unwilling to stand up against blatant election fraud?
Yep! That thing. The thing that is the alternative to Trump.
Do you prefer Trump? Do you prefer the 2.8B in bombs we just sent to Israel?
Right, so the thing that can't be done? You just agreed that the primaries are rigged, so voting for progressives do not matter.
Sweet, so we agree, in your worldview there is nothing to do. Might as well lie down and give up, the way you view the world.
You can either vote for democrats, which you've agreed is pointless because the democrats that aren't just republicans get ratfucked, or you can do nothing at all - in your worldview. Both of the actions has the same end result, following the line of reasoning that has been established with you through this comment section.
On top of all that: Your whole argument is built on a false dilemma and a misrepresentation of what leftists are arguing.
Democrat voters the second they're not the ones bombing brown people: genocide is bad, actually.
No, my whole argument is based on the reality that option b is trump, and option c does not exist. You can convince me that democrats are barely better than trump, sure. Option b is trump. Barely better than trump is better than trump. Barely, but better.
I mean, if you like trump, then just own it. Wear that maga hat proud.
When it comes to voting, yes.
Oh, you think by voting that means you cannot do anything else? One track mind, I guess. Like they say: If I can't trust you to vote, I definitely can't trust you to help out in any meaningful way.
Actually no. Especially not if one were to actually ascribe to your line of thinking. The point of voting for democrats is to slowly move US electoral politics to the left.
It has been shown, time and again, that the democratic party only moves further right, no matter if they win or lose.
If one believes in electorialism as a vector of promoting leftist politics in the us through slow, incremental, change, then it is clear that one ought to vote for a leftist third party. This would of course not have immediate results, but that is, by your line of reasoning, not something that is achievable anyway. What is achievable, through your reasoning is a long term change. Long term change would most effectively be done by creating a viable third party. The only way to do so is to vote for a third party.
If you are arguing that the issues are more urgent and not something that can be dealt with over a longer period, then we must also dismiss the argument that the democrats are in any way a viable party, since the argument of voting for them likewise rests on this idea of long term electoral change.
Not at all, but that seems to be what you think, since your immediate reaction to being told that voting for democrats is, at best, pointless, is to say "oh, so we should just do nothing?"
There is no leftist third party.
There's actually a lot. PSL would be my recommendation. Or you can just create your own. Or do a bunch of other stuff. Voting is not the only tool available to you.
How about one which isn't run by the GOP and accomplishes more than peeling off enough votes to let them win?
Like the DSA. Oh, wait, we're not supposed to vote for democrats.
Sure, vote for the DSA. Make sure to do more than vote though, as I have made abundantly clear. Go beyond electorialism.
The whole argument of voting for democrats, despite them having the same policies as republicans, is the argument that long term change can be affected.
If you buy that you must accept republican policy in order to slowly affect change, which you do by voting democrat, then the logical conclusion is that one must make that trade in the most effective manner. Which would be by voting third party.
I don't accept that. I accept that you made that up to justify voting for Republicans and making things worse.
Because one-person political parties always beat trump, yes. Genius.
Dems move right when they see Republicans winning.
oh I vote every election for the past 35 years but if its a choice between one war criminal or another, you bet your ass I leave that entry on the ballot blank. I dont support war criminals.
Dems need to learn that they cant cash AIPAC checks and win. People like you just sabotage the system by voting for them no matter what they do-- you stand for nothing and you make room for the bribery to exist. The voter problem here is you.
Why would they listen to yours, if you will vote for them regardless of policy position?
Because I voted in the primaries, too.
Lmao, good bit
Oh sure. Because no one ever says "we need to increase turnout". You're a moron