this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
231 points (88.6% liked)

memes

22946 readers
2240 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

a Skeletor Reminder:

"Due to the fact that humans are no different from any other animal when it applies to the genetics of breeding, the children of two pornstars should therefore be better pornstars than their parents."

UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN!

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

bud, Eugenics (as a theory) is not incorrect, just how stupid, evil people apply it. It's the reason African americans dominate American sports: The slavers spent 300 years breeding them for strength and endurance, because that's also what makes a good slave. It's morally wrong, yes (100%), but it's also objectively true.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

evolution and dna and genes are true, but eugenics as a pseudoscience is objectively fucking stupid and bigoted.

apropos of nothing else:

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236323/episode/part-one-francis-galton-inventor-of-eugenics-343402031

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Can you breed a dog? Can you breed a cat? Can you breed a Horse? Can you breed a Bird? Can you breed a Snake? Can you breed a Spider? Can you breed a Fish?

HUMANS ARE NO DIFFERENT

I'm not claiming its Right to do, JUST THAT IT'S POSSIBLE

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

except that breeding two scientists does not make a child who’s good at science in the same way breeding two robust dogs makes another.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

well that's true for other animals as well. The "objectionable" part is the controlled breeding. If you were to single out the smart ones that DID excell and made them have kids eventually you would start to see results. But indeed, that is the rub. It's wrong to force that sort of thing upon people with out their consent. That's why Eugenics doesn't work, not because the theory is unsound.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

start to see results

no. no you won’t. and there is zero evidence you would. zero.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then you are afflicted with anthroexceptionalisim. We are animals. We obey the same rules of genetics. You are categorically incorect.