this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
231 points (88.6% liked)

memes

22946 readers
2699 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 85 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

With the amount of porn that is generated everyday you have lick finding again a video you saw a week before, now try to find something 20 years old.

[–] rotkehle@feddit.org 56 points 2 weeks ago

security through obscurity

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

YT-DL works on porn sites

SkeletorLessonMeme.gif

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not always. Lately it seems they've gotten better at blocking. Though I do know yt-dlp has a ton of options for spoofing credentials and stuff, so it can prob still be done. Just not as simple as it used to be

[–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 weeks ago

I'd hazard the number one reason people consume porn is because they don't have lick

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I can imagine how fun it must be for kids knowing their parents did the thing, then got pregant, and afterwards still kept doing the thing.

Case in point, Remy Lacroix.

But then kids need to associate their parent to their artistic name which may not be obvious.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LaCroix entered the adult film industry in December 2011, with a gang bang scene for Kink.com.

She actually started off with a bang.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It really was one of the greatest starts.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I always solidarize with the poor guy who draws the short straw and gets stuck as a ridee on the couch.

[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Man, I remember reading this comic in college when it was new.

Yeah, same. I can't believe it's been 23 years.

[–] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

i wouldn't mind having such an origin story tbh

[–] Localhorst86@feddit.org 26 points 2 weeks ago
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 weeks ago

Tbh considering the porn trends in last couple years, it's more likely this

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine if she took part in a pregnancy fetish porn.

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Than they'd finally get to know who their dad was.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

a Skeletor Reminder:

"Due to the fact that humans are no different from any other animal when it applies to the genetics of breeding, the children of two pornstars should therefore be better pornstars than their parents."

UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN!

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

bud, Eugenics (as a theory) is not incorrect, just how stupid, evil people apply it. It's the reason African americans dominate American sports: The slavers spent 300 years breeding them for strength and endurance, because that's also what makes a good slave. It's morally wrong, yes (100%), but it's also objectively true.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

evolution and dna and genes are true, but eugenics as a pseudoscience is objectively fucking stupid and bigoted.

apropos of nothing else:

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236323/episode/part-one-francis-galton-inventor-of-eugenics-343402031

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Can you breed a dog? Can you breed a cat? Can you breed a Horse? Can you breed a Bird? Can you breed a Snake? Can you breed a Spider? Can you breed a Fish?

HUMANS ARE NO DIFFERENT

I'm not claiming its Right to do, JUST THAT IT'S POSSIBLE

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

except that breeding two scientists does not make a child who’s good at science in the same way breeding two robust dogs makes another.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

well that's true for other animals as well. The "objectionable" part is the controlled breeding. If you were to single out the smart ones that DID excell and made them have kids eventually you would start to see results. But indeed, that is the rub. It's wrong to force that sort of thing upon people with out their consent. That's why Eugenics doesn't work, not because the theory is unsound.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

start to see results

no. no you won’t. and there is zero evidence you would. zero.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then you are afflicted with anthroexceptionalisim. We are animals. We obey the same rules of genetics. You are categorically incorect.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TheMuffinMan@piefed.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

was just gonna say this

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't think they'd care? Other than "well, don't wanna see my parent naked"

I can't imagine a porn actress/actor teaching their kids to be stuck-up prudish misogynistic assholes.

Porn actors tend to be people who think the exact opposite, that people are too prudish

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And why not the children of male porn performers?

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a sort of pride in your parent handing out the backshots, less so if your parent was the one taking said backshots.

[–] tyranny@crazypeople.online 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i wonder what this says about societal gender roles as a whole🤔

[–] YeahToast@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'd say be careful mentioning holes on a thread about porn. Will turn into a pie before you know it

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

With relatively few exceptions, those don't get a lot of attention, often aren't even mentioned.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

"Mommy! Mommy! I saw you on the internet! Tommy has shown me a video!"

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

“Actresses”?

I haven’t read that word this century.