this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2026
95 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

88389 readers
3575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what is the thing with DNS? why is it 2 thin slabs?

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

DNS is held up by a surprisingly small number of root servers. Their physical locations are not disclosed.

No what? The geographical locations for all 13 root " servers" and who manages them are well known (the only problem is the US is in charge of all of them). The actual number of physical servers is significantly greater. Actual requests are serviced using IP Anycast and can scale significantly better than connection-oriented services.

Misconfiguration is the bigger issue. Dnssec is not easy to get right, while caching makes things harder to fix immediately.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Advertising is more akin to a piece of the foundation that grew an arm and started swatting at itself and other parts of the structure

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Seems like we could at least get rid of the sharks.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago

We're working on it

[–] UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sharks are great for a fully functioning ecosystem, Cloudflare on the other hand is more like Jellyfish.

[–] boonhet@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People wouldn't use it if it didn't work. It has its own downtimes but that's nothing compared to how a DDoS attack from a bored skiddie might take you down.

[–] UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl 0 points 1 day ago

Hey @cloudflare, how come you’re protecting beamed.st, the DDoS service that’s attacking Ubuntu?

https://www.webpronews.com/cloudflares-dual-role-in-the-ubuntu-ddos-crisis-protection-or-pressure/

It’s a protection racket don’t fall for it.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ticks that can breathe underwater.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

The "sharks" are actually Russian submarines.