politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Accuses? Just look at Israeli social media, they post videos of the crimes.
The news is reporting as accused and will do so until some tribunal adjudicates that a genocide occurs. Until then it is libel.
Libel? Then I would love to see the discovery phase for this. You can literally see that it is a genocide from outer space. Go ahead and sign me up for that lawsuit ya spineless chicken shits.
Yes but it has to be an official finding before the media can report it as such. Until then, it’s an allegation.
Facts is a defense, you don't need to wait for it
Besides, you already have those official findings by multiple international organizations
Oh really? https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/10/7/three-years-of-israels-genocide-in-gaza-in-numbers
American media is spineless, that is why we have a fascist president but they won't call it as such until it is defeated.
There are ethical standards. They will get sued, no possibility of it not happening. You advocate for that?
Yes, I advocate for having higher ethical standards even if it means a genocidal regime sues you. Hearing someone make excuses for pedophiles and genociders as an appeal to ethical standards is pathetic.
Ethical standards for thee but not for me, said the administration. tRump himself personally slanders and libels private citizens regularly, and pretty well anybody he doesn't like without hesitation or account. At a certain point the standards are being weaponized, just like their politics has done with civility. I think if they took a principaled stand and got sued, they could win, and I do support that actually. Will that happen? No.
This has nothing to do with trump. These standards have existed for a century.
What an absurd assertion, it absolutely has something to do with him and the precedents set by his complete disregard for if not distainful and explicit abuse of the standards you seem to want to apply selectively. You're not wrong that those have been the standards for a century, and now they have changed because he has set the new standard with his behaviour, society will have to adjust accordingly. Not unlike his party breaking procedural precedents by selectively adhereing to them as is advantageous to stack a supreme court that would set the stage for tRump's authoritarian power grab. Choosing to cherry pick and talk like these things exist in a vacuum only exasperates the demolition of both legal and social norms and standards, and cements the new ones. It even conveniently ignores his prolific use of frivolous SLAPP suits to silence valid legal action against him, or coerce favourable actions and manipulate behaviour of private companies he has grievances with (most of which are dropped or settled when attention dies down) quite directly corrupting the administration of justice. Your prescription translates to just let it happen, if you admit it or not.