this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
559 points (92.8% liked)

Political Memes

12647 readers
1778 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't like spending this much time arguing against campism but they just keep talking at me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I agree with you, I believe. The difference being that the authoritarian nature be geared towards exclusively a group that is VOLUNTARILY JOINED and nothing else. If you want to own that much wealth, you get some fancy new governmental oversight and regulations. Congrats. I don't believe that that has be "authoritarian" to the VAST majority of people. Well over 95%.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Totally agree but, it would have to be aggressive in our current world. They will not willingly part with their wealth.

I'm assuming all options would be on the table for mitigating this level of greed. Obviously in an effort to get to a better society.

[–] HoopyFrood@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago

If the wealthy were willing to give up their wealth without the very real threat of violence against them, we would simply not be having this conversation and instead be discussing the appropriate levels of wealth with the wealthy. The existence of this debate implies that we have all - in some form or another - accepted that the wealthy need to be parted with their wealth against their will.

To achieve a society where all are free and able to live out their potential, regardless of the labels we put on this freer society, wealth redistribution is necessary. If we say the wealthy keep their wealth then we are describing a society where only the wealthy are free.