this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
412 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

12296 readers
2553 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Ok, I shouldn't say this, but members of the military are not innocent. They are combatants, by definition.

Idk what this guy is about, or whatever, but killing military members is not killing civilians.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

That's not actually true. For it to be true and relevant, Hasan would have to have been an overt agent or officer of an enemy nation. To justifiably kill American service members, he would have to be an enemy combatant. If he were an enemy combatant, the service members he killed would also be considered combatants, and his attack would simply be an act of war. He could not be held or tried as a criminal. He would be entitled to all privileges and protections afforded to Prisoners of War. He could be held without trial until the cessation of hostilities between the belligerent countries, and then repatriated. He could not face charge or punishment for having killed combatants.

But he was not an overt enemy officer. He was an officer of the United States, acting on his own and not as an overt agent of a hostile state. His status was not "enemy combatant". The personnel he killed would not be considered "combatants" in this act; they would be considered innocent victims of a criminal act. No different than civilian victims. Hasan was not a combatant, and could take no actions as a combatant, lawful or otherwise.

Enemy states can lawfully kill military service members as an act of war. Random individuals cannot. The random individual cannot claim that his victims were combatants. The random individual cannot claim the protections of POW status. To that individual, his victims are innocent adults.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Bro, I tried to read this, you accused hasan of shit, I think you are fake. Fake. You.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What?

It is only under the Laws of Armed Conflict ("LOAC") that the "combatant" distinction arises, but you clearly do not understand LOAC.

For LOAC to apply, there would have to be an enemy state involved, and Hasan would have to be an overt officer of that state. But there was no enemy state, and Hasan was an officer of the US.

Without LOAC to give his victims the status of "combatant", they are innocent. Their status as military members is irrelevant; there is no relevant distinction between them and "civilians".

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Wtf are you on about, stop murdering littel kids. And adults.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I don't understand this comment - I think the tweet in the post says children. Am I missing something?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I was under the impression this was referencing the guy that shot up that army base or whatever, killed like 13 of them.

I am not condoning that, not at all, just pointing out the OP is full of shit in implying they are non combatants, or whatevver drivel he or she said to that effect.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 4 points 2 hours ago

OH.

That makes so much more sense. Thank you for clarifying.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Wait Tweet? What social media are you seeing this on. I don't patronize twatter, and their posts are twatts by the way.

Way before musk, the nazi cosplaying cunt, bought twatter, it was already shit, and Israel's bitch.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You're right I said tweet. It's a blue sky post that is the image for this post. My mistake.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Twatt, get it right. But thanks.