Televised Nuremberg trials 2 lfg
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
383 points (99.2% liked)
Microblog Memes
12296 readers
2534 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm just throwing it out there that this is how the US used to deal with those who were traitors to the country...
So.... Yeah. (Not the televised part though lol I know y'all gonna jump on that)
Can we execute pete hegseth? And donald trump?
I’m a no-death penalty absolutist, but that doesn’t mean I don’t think there are people who deserve to die. Hasan probably does, and Hegseth does too; I don’t want see Hegseth die, but it wouldn’t break my heart if some Iranian special forces kidnapped him and administered their own brand of justice.
Why do you think trump is trying to shut down the international criminal court?
He can pardon them all in the usa but they will never be able to leave the country.
Idk Ol Bibi is jetting around without a care in the world.
Every country he flew through recently either was selling Israel massive amounts of weapons. or actively buying Israel weapon systems.
And Bibi is still president, as is trump, and they have diplomatic immunity. At some point they won't be in office. Then the tune changes.
Unfun fact the American Service Members Protection Act which was passed under Bush Jr when the ICC being established, specifically allows for the US to protects israeli (and other) government officials from the ICC.
Diplomatic immunity would be moot hereif they were in an ICC signatory country, even if France wants to pretend otherwise 🤷♀️
Edit cause I hit enter too fast. This law survived 3 Democrat presidential terms. Maybe they can get around to changing it next time.
At some point they won't be in office. Then the tune changes.
I sincerely hope so.
Same with Masoud Pezeshkian and Mojtaba Khamenei , right?
Eh I’m ok without state sanctioned violence. Maybe just lock them up in the centers they created?
Oh ot won't be state sanctioned. Mandated and sanctioned by the masses.
Ok, I shouldn't say this, but members of the military are not innocent. They are combatants, by definition.
Idk what this guy is about, or whatever, but killing military members is not killing civilians.
I don't understand this comment - I think the tweet in the post says children. Am I missing something?
I was under the impression this was referencing the guy that shot up that army base or whatever, killed like 13 of them.
I am not condoning that, not at all, just pointing out the OP is full of shit in implying they are non combatants, or whatevver drivel he or she said to that effect.
OH.
That makes so much more sense. Thank you for clarifying.
Wait Tweet? What social media are you seeing this on. I don't patronize twatter, and their posts are twatts by the way.
Way before musk, the nazi cosplaying cunt, bought twatter, it was already shit, and Israel's bitch.
You're right I said tweet. It's a blue sky post that is the image for this post. My mistake.
Twatt, get it right. But thanks.
That's not actually true. For it to be true and relevant, Hasan would have to have been an overt agent or officer of an enemy nation. To justifiably kill American service members, he would have to be an enemy combatant. If he were an enemy combatant, the service members he killed would also be considered combatants, and his attack would simply be an act of war. He could not be held or tried as a criminal. He would be entitled to all privileges and protections afforded to Prisoners of War. He could be held without trial until the cessation of hostilities between the belligerent countries, and then repatriated. He could not face charge or punishment for having killed combatants.
But he was not an overt enemy officer. He was an officer of the United States, acting on his own and not as an overt agent of a hostile state. His status was not "enemy combatant". The personnel he killed would not be considered "combatants" in this act; they would be considered innocent victims of a criminal act. No different than civilian victims. Hasan was not a combatant, and could take no actions as a combatant, lawful or otherwise.
Enemy states can lawfully kill military service members as an act of war. Random individuals cannot. The random individual cannot claim that his victims were combatants. The random individual cannot claim the protections of POW status. To that individual, his victims are innocent adults.
Bro, I tried to read this, you accused hasan of shit, I think you are fake. Fake. You.
What?
It is only under the Laws of Armed Conflict ("LOAC") that the "combatant" distinction arises, but you clearly do not understand LOAC.
For LOAC to apply, there would have to be an enemy state involved, and Hasan would have to be an overt officer of that state. But there was no enemy state, and Hasan was an officer of the US.
Without LOAC to give his victims the status of "combatant", they are innocent. Their status as military members is irrelevant; there is no relevant distinction between them and "civilians".
Wtf are you on about, stop murdering littel kids. And adults.
I'm not at all keen on watching executions but I'd watch that one.
Fellas, his name is Peterape Kegsbreath
What about the boats? Those lives count too
The fishermen are mentioned in the OP. The boats themselves were not alive.
The man himself wants to die. His body, his choice.