this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
875 points (97.7% liked)

memes

23019 readers
2700 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 15 hours ago

... what?

Yes, Statement 1 does logically follow from Statement 2.

Statement 2 is broad and unqualified, universal.

If you accept that as true, Statement 1 definitely does logically follow from it.

If I tell you, "I want to be left alone, and be independent", then the inescapable conclusion is that either I will initiate interaction with you, or if you initiate, you are violating my wishes.

Being independent means that one is the acting agent, not the one being acted upon, it means being the initiator or instigator, being proactive instead of reactive.

If you want to say that Statement 2 actually is qualified, has actual specific conditions where 'leave me alone and let me be independent' does not apply, well, then we would need those conditions to be clearly stated.

The entire problem is that they are not clearly stated, and that every single individual has different specific conditions, unique to them, which must be communicated before they can be understood.