this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
915 points (93.9% liked)

Political Memes

12722 readers
2457 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is no such thing as "anarcho-capitalist"

Anarchism is fundamentally oppositional to capitalism.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

These tend to be libertarians from Texas or something. You are right though

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Confidently wrong. There are different kinds of anarchism, and yours might be fundamentally oppositional to capitalism. But to deny the existence of anarcho-capitalists is counterproductive, because they exist, and they're a serious threat to be aware of.

The idea is that in an anarchist society, there's no governing body to regulate businesses, and so they get to do whatever they want. It results in a neofeudal corporate oligarchy, a la Curtis Yarvin. You can argue that it's not really anarchistic if it results in oppressive systems. They might argue that it's only anarchy if there's nothing stopping them from oppressing you.

The point is, anarchy is a big umbrella, and just because you might be anarcho-syndicalist or something else doesn't mean that your version of anarchy is the only version of anarchy.

Arguing over what constitutes "the true anarchy" is pointless. Critique anarcho-capitalism to your heart's desire, but to deny that it exists implies that there's nothing to critique.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It results in a neofeudal corporate oligarchy

Yes, because it is neo-feudalism trying to wear the label of Anarchism. That doesn't mean it is Anarchism.

By your logic, "National Socialism" is a socialist philosophy because it calls itself socialism. Which is an utterly stupid thing to claim.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I never said what it calls itself is an accurate description, only that there are people who claim it