this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
159 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31081 readers
2207 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Military officials are sketching out a plan that could deploy a few thousand National Guard members, officials said. The use of active-duty forces has also been discussed.

Its pretty clear that the plan is to wreck Democratic-leaning cities one by one.

Access options:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They need to be so severely booed when they arrive. There is no respect or honor in their service being used this way. They should be ashamed.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Living in Chicago I expect nothing less than that.

My guess is they’ll station everyone in the loop for optics but not actually put military in the actually dangerous streets.

Ain’t nobody going to North Lawndale or Garfield Park.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Heh, if they did, all that knowledge from Iraq and Afghanistan won't do them any good.

Different groups of guerilla fighters attacking with different uncoordinated tactics, no Intel on capabilities or location, and no tech to exploit. Not to mention no language barriers.

[–] ShieldsUp@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Plus they will be working against our own people. When deployed to another country there is some mental disconnect happening that I don't think will happen domestically.

Aside from tactics and training not working which I agree with, I don't believe the majority will be motivated to be effective in any way.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a completely unrelated thing but please tell me Garfield Park has lots of Garfield the cat graffiti.

[–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago

Graffiti, yes. Graffiti of pussy even!

Garfield? Not so much

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

It would be funnier to give them campaign medals. And then when they match in parade they can tell people that they are veterans of the battle of Washington or what ever. Just pull the absolute piss out of them, have podcasts where they discuss their time with Ukrainian veterans to the point where they give up out of embarrassment