this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
159 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31081 readers
3183 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Military officials are sketching out a plan that could deploy a few thousand National Guard members, officials said. The use of active-duty forces has also been discussed.

Its pretty clear that the plan is to wreck Democratic-leaning cities one by one.

Access options:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Each time he's done this they wasted a shitload of money, his numbers dropped and he ends up looking like an idiot. Even more importantly, it brings them no closer to expanding their control over the populace. They might actually be too stupid to be effective authoritarians.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Funny if you think "his numbers" actually mater at this point in time.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Really unpopular presidents lose elections. Really unpopular kings lose their heads. It matters, even if he's messing with the election.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with most Democrats is they assume anything said or done during the next election will matter.

Seriously, what are angry letters from Schumer going to do when the SCOTUS rules in his favor over ignore several electoral votes cause he claims they're fake?

What's the cabinet going to accomplish when it's all hand picked fuckwads who play his tune like a bad 3rd world regime?

What's the vote of half the house or Senate matter when you need a clear majority to enact an impeachment, and half the country is still good with this all?

Lemmy needs a remindme bot, cause I really want to see how this goes in 3.5 years.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Very poorly is my best guess at this point. I don't think the US is going to have free and clear elections anymore. Time will tell, but too many people are way too focused on things like numbers and such.

The fascists don't give a fuck about numbers.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I'm more making a comment on you're not going to have a proper/legit election.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The numbers always matter. Dictators just get by with smaller numbers.

Are all these "elections don't matter" people a psy-op? Either take up arms because democracy has failed or fuck off with this Trump-aiding "voting doesn't matter" fatalism.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah approval doesn't matter until approval really fucking matters. I'm not saying this is going to cost him power, but I am saying that Franco's white terrors weren't because he just hated his opposition so much. They were about stopping it's spread and its ability to gain influence.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Nah, I just think you're never going to have a proper election again. We'll see I guess.

[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Each time he improves the process, scopes out his opposition and finds out what he needs congress to pass to make it easier. These first few times wont work, they aren't meant to, they are meant to set everything up so he can control the populace with military force without any legal opposition