this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
548 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

74407 readers
2197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 16 points 23 hours ago

I don't know if I'm stupid or not but I tried going to peertube and I couldn't for the life of my understand what I was looking at. It just seemed like a vague soup of instances with no continuity or ability to know what I was looking at. Maybe I accessed it wrong but I didn't fully get it.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every substantial youtube channel should be hosting and backing up to a self-hosted, owned, peertube.

[–] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Issue is such channels need giant amounts of storage for this.

Linus tech Tips showed his multiple upgrades over the years it's quite crazy what they need on storage space.

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago

Storage? Traffic is the real cost

As someone who worked for years in video transcoding, archiving, streaming, and content management in general: there are absolutely ways to do this efficiently in a self hosted context. You could absolutely build a system that fits your bespoke needs in all of these categories.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not just storage, but bandwidth. Streaming one video to potentially thousands of people at once can get very expensive.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

LTT storage is excessive. He stores all his footage in full quality instead of just storing his final edited videos in a compressed format. Plus if you're a youtuber with millions of subscribers you can afford to pay for a few TB of storage to hold and serve your videos. Its not that expensive.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 23 points 20 hours ago

He stores all his footage in full quality instead of just storing his final edited videos in a compressed format.

That's the right way to do it, you want to avoid generation loss as much as possible.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not after you lose your channel and all your income. PeerTube doesn't appeal to people who make a living at this because there's no revenue stream.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

there is revenue stream. liberapay is integrated, get your viewers to subscribe through there. they can donate any amount, literally.

then its also common that content creators cooperate with companies, mostly tech companies, to advertise their products. that can still be done on peertube. what they can't anymore is to show generic ads for everyone every few minutes.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 12 hours ago

Oh I did not know this, thanks for the correction. And you're right about sponsors. I'd be curious to hear the thoughts of a more income-minded content creator on whether this model is viable and what it would take to make it work.

[–] loie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Agreed. For archival, honestly 720p is good enough. Hockey highlights are uploaded in 720p, but 60 fps for the high motion - for GN or any other info based talking head type stuff, 30 fps will look fine.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip -1 points 23 hours ago

Hosting a peertube instance would be almost nothing I comparison to this. It'd just be a duplicate of all uploaded videos at worst, which he's storing many times that amount of raw footage anyway. They probably wouldn't even notice the overhead.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

With many, many servers, otherwise things would go down fast on each new video release. And each server having a fuckton of bandwidth, too. That's not free.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago

its fine if its first and foremost a backup, and not a public platform. then you don't need the bandwidth. then they can open it up when google deleted their channel. they still need to figure out the capacity issues, but at least the content was not lost.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 17 hours ago

its fine if its first and foremost a backup, and not a public platform. then you don't need the bandwidth. then they can open it up when google deleted their channel. they still need to figure out the capacity issues, but at least the content was not lost.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

These days I am looking at their video on their channel on Rumble while working. I think they are achieving financial and political pressure in the most wholesome way possible.

That said, I don't think I am going to click on anything else on Rumble, as it is all Tucker Calson, bitcoin and other shit like that. I don't see any future in it; it has achieved Dailymotion status in no time.