this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
546 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

74407 readers
2197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 40 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Waaaay less money to be made there. Not saying he's exclusively doing this for the money like the other reply, but we're not talking about some solo guy making videos in his free time for fun. The man is running a business, needs money to make this videos happen, and to my knowledge this is his job.

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

Can someone explain me why creators cant do both? Reupload a mirror on peertube.

Its in their interest to have a solid backup when youtube inevitably dies.

They can, Gardiner Bryant does, and Louis Rossmann uploads to Odyssee. Afaik, there's nothing preventing a creator from doing that aside from time.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It'd be dangerous to his revenue stream.

If he reduces views on YT, the algo will recommend him less. His internal sponsors won't pay more for the non YT content so he'll just be gutting his own traffic if it takes off. Assuming he has disks around with all his finished content on it, he could stand it up later if he wanted, but it's not like Peertube can host an unlimited amount of video for free. Someone is paying for those disks and for the transfer of those bits.

Ideally, he'd stand up his own PT and we'd share in watching his stuff and reduce costs Peer style. But he's still going to be out a serious payment stream and the PT network can't just perpetually bare the cost of his storage.

It's like if LMG wanted to host their back catalog, we'd need peer tube hosts with a PB of storage sitting around ready to take his catalog.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Linus has nowhere near a PB worth of content, between all of his channels.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

assuming they didn't keep 8K, Just the raw 4k footage from just the wan show for one year would be ~150tb

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

To further clarify, his big PB-scale servers are for hosting their archive of raw footage.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

this is speculation, but it's possible that youtube don't like it when large mainstream creators have backup platforms and will start cracking down.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 4 points 7 hours ago

LOTS of big creators post their videos multiple places.

[–] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 4 points 13 hours ago

That's definitely an option. It would be a good idea for him to do that, I think. But my main point is that losing YouTube would be devastating for GN regardless of whether or not they're on peertube, and moving entirely to peertube isn't really feasible for them