this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
746 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31134 readers
3383 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Unlearned9545@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Can we please for the love of God have a judge actually enforce their order for once? He has shown over and over that he's just going to do what he wants. The rest of us would have to sleep on a jail bench for a few days then still be forced to comply.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s the problem with the separation of powers… The executive branch is supposed to be the one that enforces the laws… The judicial branch has very little power to actually enforce their rulings. And Trump is the head of the executive branch.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure on the legal veracity but I read somewhere after one of his MANY ignored court orders that the Marshals might have the ability to enforce it somehow

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

They might. We never seem to know for sure how our own laws work, but it is a distinct possibility.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 months ago

Trump doesn't personally fill the SNAP accounts, and Trump doesn't personally manage the money.

Start charging the employees with violating court orders.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

That's what happens when the Supreme Court decides that when the president does it, it's not illegal. He does what he wants because the Republican justices decided that The President is above the law. There literally isn't any legal way for a judge to enforce their orders over Trump.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Hey, guys that work for Trump, punish Trump!"

You can see why it doesn't work so well.

[–] Unlearned9545@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Judges don't work for Trump at least legally speaking.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, the judges are asking the Executive branch (which Trump is the head of) to do the enforcing. The judges don't have an enforcement arm.