Microblog Memes

9797 readers

1527 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31@lemmy.world

aeronmelon@lemmy.world

needanke@feddit.org

375

no context flight map (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)

submitted 5 days ago by io@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://aus.social/@sinjut/115637775938766580

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] grindemup@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Honestly how much does that mean when they lack representatives / are unable to vote, and do not get full protection of US constitution (as per Wikipedia)? Sounds like citizens in name only..

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Doesn’t your logic also throw out anyone living in Washington, D.C.?

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

Yes, and that's also a significant problem and should be illegal.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Taxation without representation is a very american thing.

[–] grindemup@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I mean, is it though? Seems like there are a whole lot of such countries.. at the very least, every country which isn't some sort of democracy.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It is. But enough of them still think that going full statehood brings other evils and they're content with the sublevel of protection they have. And that is their right, we shouldn't force it on anyone who doesn't want it.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Didn't their last vote on it get 57% for statehood? I think it just wasn't approved by Congress

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico_statehood_movement

Some of the votes were problematic because of boycotts, turnouts, and how the ballots were phrased or what they offered to vote on. I don't know what would be best for them, but that's also why I only think the offer should always be on the table and let them decide.

A big part of the issue that is also affecting other states is mentioned in that article, the capping of the House numbers. We do not have proper representation in numbers that can handle the population (and that doesn't even get into gerrymandering).

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Some of the votes were problematic because of boycotts, turnouts, and how the ballots were phrased or what they offered to vote on. I don't know what would be best for them, but that's also why I only think the offer should always be on the table and let them decide.

meh, you can use the same excuses every time they have an election to avoid doing anything.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Words cannot express how much I hate the cap on House reps XD