this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
211 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

10730 readers
318 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This may backfire on Carney big time. I'm a Carney on kind of guy, but i'm also a BCer and this actually pissed me off. Alberta isn't the only province that thinks it's getting fucked by confederation, way to prove we have no agency in this country. Hope they remember this when the next confidence vote is called for.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Beaverton... I almost fell for it as well

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know it is a beaverton article. They did however sign a deal without BC input, which is the essence of the joke.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a memorandum of understanding, saying they will look at it.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So if Smith made a memorandum of understanding with the PM over a pipeline in Quebec without it's input, what would you think the reaction would be? It would go over really well wouldn't it? Lol.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I know it would be the exact same, and I would say the exact same thing. It is a MoU that means nothing.