this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
211 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

10730 readers
302 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah Beaverton. I almost believed it

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They got quoted by ~~the NY Times~~ Time Magazine this week….

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago

I am sure if she sees this she will try! She did get booed at her pep rally when she talked about Carney.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Time magazine quoted the Beaverton as a source on a Hoekstra quote.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 42 points 6 days ago (1 children)

“This is not fair,” Eby said. “Absolute power to control the lives of British Columbians should not be in the hands of people none of them voted for. It should be in the hands of people fewer than half of them voted for but who nevertheless have all the power because that’s how first-past-the-post elections work. It’s called democracy. Kind of.”

Political comedy gold.

You should also read the last time The Beaverton covered Smith's notwithstanding clause use. And then the time before that.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago

“The notwithstanding clause is generally reserved for serious disagreements between the provinces and the courts, or whenever Quebec feels like being more xenophobic,” ...

So good.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Wait, so if you believe an Onion article it's said you "ate the onion", does the same apply to a Beaverton article?

[–] lemmyng@piefed.ca 17 points 6 days ago

Well it is a bit less of a mouthful than "I licked the beaver's vanilla flavored taint glands."

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 14 points 6 days ago

I want everyone to know that i ate the beaver, and i eat it most nights.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ate the beavertail if you want to keep it pg-13.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

That's disgusting.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

I ate the beaver.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 20 points 6 days ago

Don't give her ideas!

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago
[–] CkrnkFrnchMn@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Bloody garbage...world is messed up enough as it is we don't need this rubish

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This may backfire on Carney big time. I'm a Carney on kind of guy, but i'm also a BCer and this actually pissed me off. Alberta isn't the only province that thinks it's getting fucked by confederation, way to prove we have no agency in this country. Hope they remember this when the next confidence vote is called for.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Beaverton... I almost fell for it as well

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know it is a beaverton article. They did however sign a deal without BC input, which is the essence of the joke.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s a memorandum of understanding, saying they will look at it.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So if Smith made a memorandum of understanding with the PM over a pipeline in Quebec without it's input, what would you think the reaction would be? It would go over really well wouldn't it? Lol.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

I know it would be the exact same, and I would say the exact same thing. It is a MoU that means nothing.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Between O&G cult gaslighting and Beaverton jokes, it can be hard to tell what's true and what's false.