this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
253 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28312 readers
2387 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Powell's a piece of shit, but anyone trump replaces him with would be 100x worse.

That doesn't mean if we actually pull some FDR shit we should keep Powell, or any of his buddies tho.

[–] Licksrocks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

...

You're asking why an average American thinks the chair of the chief reserve is a piece of shit?

Like, do you want some specific examples, or are you asking for broad strokes on why capitalism has been a wealth transfer to oligarchs for decades?

Super general so it applies to all the Fed tho:

The only reason inflation exists, is so that people are forced to invest. There will always be inflation because our economic system needs it to get regular Americans to invest, then the oligarchs can get it.

If $100 was worth $100 a decade from now, people would be stashing it under mattresses like a century ago. And overtime people would earn more, no more pay cuts disguised as aub-inflation raises.

Like...

I'm not trying to come off as a dick here, but I know it's probably going to happen. It's just honestly stunning to get that question about why someone could think even the best chair of the Federal Reserve we've had in the last century was still a giant piece of shit.

They're not independent of the president to save us, the fed chair is independent to protect the oligarchs from unpredictable change while the rest of us get distracted by all the other changes that show up from alternating between neoliberals and Republicans

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Deflation is bad. Then people stop spending, postpone all purchases, economy grinds to a halt, people lose jobs and companies go bankrupt.

Hyperinflation is bad. Then people spend money like toilet paper: money becomes worthless. No one has anything left to invest or to save for pension or a big plan or dream.

The general goal of aiming for about 2% inflation is basically just there to try to prevent those two worst case scenarios from happening. It's the least bad of all evils: money sort of keeps it's value, evolution of product prices are rather predictable, people know what they will be able to buy with their wages. Inflation is not inherently tied to capitalism only. Socialist/communist economic experiments experience very similar phenomena.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The 2% inflation (together with property taxes) also forces the wealthy to keep their assets producing wealth for people other than themselves.

If they could just hoard money for generations without it deflating to worthlessness, then the level of investment and jobs would be dramatically less.

This is how the landed gentry of medieval Europe could keep all the land tied up for hunting while not having to give a shit that the serfs were starving.

Currently you have to keep your assets earning to pay for themselves which generally leads to employment and broad increases in living standards.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

The general goal of aiming for about 2% inflation is basically just there

To guarantee on a long timeline the rich make steady money...

Even this short term volitility is how they make the giant leaps in wealth.

And buddy...

Socialism still has it, because socialism is just ethical capitalism. It not "not capitalism", it's just not a complete free fall. I thought you knew what you were saying till that bit.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fed chair is not the cause of inflation. So I don't see why "inflation is bad" is evidence to why JPow is a POS.