this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
568 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28858 readers
1826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What happened with the big hack of the ice database with officer identities and then there was a "Russian" DDoS attack that stopped people from downloading it. Did they succeed in shutting that down I guess?

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You mean this?

https://wiki.icelist.is/index.php/Category:Agents

Not sure if it's the "hack" you are talking about. But around that time this site was being ddosd

[–] itistime@infosec.pub 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The site is up: https://icelist.is/

But, it doesn’t have the leaked data on it. I don’t know why he is sitting on it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Homeland_Security_employee_data_leak

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have a scrape of the site from before it was blocked.

[–] itistime@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

The 4500 contacts were on the site before it was attacked, but is now only outdated info gathered from sources like linkedin? If so, I would love a copy.

[–] TheOneAndOnly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I was wondering that myself. Very disappointing if that's the case, and not that it was just a bullshit Internet rumor...