this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
377 points (97.7% liked)

politics

31093 readers
1953 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It sounds like a bunch of Democrats want to cave in exchange for no concessions whatsoever. Edit: Bloomberg has more details

Current likely Democratic votes for this:

  • Shaheen - NH
  • Hassan - NH
  • King - ME
  • Fetterman - PA
  • Peters - MI
  • Durbin - IL
  • Warner - VA
  • Kaine - VA
  • Ossoff- GA
  • Warnock - GA

If you want to change things, you need to call their DC office NOW, and leave an email if you can't.

Edit 2: enough Democrats joined the Republicans to reopen the government with no real concessions.

The list:

  • Durbin
  • Hassan
  • King
  • Cortez Masto
  • Kaine
  • Shaheen
  • Rosen
  • Fetterman
  • Schumer
  • Gillibrand

There was a caucus meeting right before this, so the bulk of the Senate Democrats were likely OK with giving in, even if not willing to vote for it in public

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

A deal?! 🫢

Is it impeachment? Prison? Beheading? Any real consequences???

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I emailed mine last week, begging them to hold the line. As usual, spineless fucking cowards.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

enough Democrats joined the Republicans to reopen the government with no real concessions.

The list:

  • Durbin
  • Hassan
  • King
  • Cortez Masto
  • Kaine
  • Shaheen
  • Rosen
  • Fetterman
  • Schumer
  • Gillibrand

Where are you getting that information & why not cite primary sources? It's on the senate website:

  • Cortez Masto
  • Durbin
  • Fetterman
  • Hassan
  • Kaine
  • Rosen
  • Shaheen

Notably, Schumer voted no.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Schumer coordinated the Yes vote among Democrats

You also missed King

It wasn't on the Senate website yet when I posted

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Not sure how to feel about this, people were going hungry and planes were being stopped. Yes there is nothing stopping the GOP from doing this again, but it's mostly a charade already - they could have abolished the filibuster and got what they wanted anyways.

The Dems have this attitude that if the people suffer enough they will learn they were wrong for not voting for them, but it feels like ground hog's day with that strategy because misinformed people always learn the wrong lesson. At the end of the day it's more important for our leaders to do good than to prove they were right.

Edit: It seems food stamps were back on, so now I'm just pissed they wasted everyone's time and energy.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The American Voter, voted Republicans back in after starting TWO illegal wars, destroying our public standing and crashing the economy.

People relying on Americans learning anything need their heads examined.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

"Doing good" means fighting back against the fascists, not rolling over and giving them everything they want just because they threatened to hurt innocent people. That's all the more reason to fight.

I stg, are liberals really just that bad at negotiations? You can't apply this extremely short term, base utilitarianism approach to the real world, it's just fundamentally wrong.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Time to get busy supporting your favorite third party candidate.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or primary them, steal their D

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't think Democrat leadership has a dick. Or a vage. They lack hardness, depth, and warmth.

They are the Barbie dolls of the political world, and have become the Turdpublican's playthings.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago

Like a cheap suit. Stay classy.

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Totally expected Catherine Cortez Masto (NV) to be on that list

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Saw this coming from a mile away.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 6 points 10 months ago

Well fuck me, I was 2 miles away and saw this coming

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

~~Both VA senators saw the statewide sweep and thought to themselves, ‘nope can’t have that.’ What a rug pull.~~

Edit: I thought the list at the top was definitive, Mark Warner has come out Against the bill, although that’s probably only because they agreed he gets to sit out since he’s up for re-election next year.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 4 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Where's the dissenters in this thread?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›