this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
223 points (95.9% liked)

politics

26576 readers
1133 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Vance is an absolute dud of a candidate but I'm sure the Democrats will manage to come up with someone even more ludicrously unsuited.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

DNC torn between HRC, Newsom, and Schumer

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about Sinema? She's super qualified.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Oh, of course! Those primaries will be lit!

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

By unsuited, do you mean for the job or to get the vote of fickle progressives?

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Dem candidates are never bad, progressives are just fickle!" - you

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're not worse than JD Vance, which was the contention. If the commenter is not coming at it from the disgruntled progressive stance, as so many here are, then that part of my response was off the mark.

The commenter is being very coy about what was meant.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You don't even know who it's gonna be and you're already stating they'll be better than Vance as if it's a truism. I can absolutely see the DNC fucking up so badly that Vance looks like a better alternative. INB4 we end up with two Peter Thiel acolytes running against each other; "abundance" vs. "Christian" nationalism, a true clash of ideas.

load more comments (2 replies)

"The party cannot fail, it can only be failed."

- every moderate fuckwad stuck in 1992

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What job exactly would that be? To do the bidding of the oligarchs or to actually represent the electorate?

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm asking what you mean, so feel free to add details. Let's just use Kamala Harris as an example.

Who would be better suited to do the bidding of the oligarchs? Trump or Harris.

Who would be better suited to actually represent the electorate? Trump or Harris.

Who would be better suited to get the vote of fickle progressives? Trump or Harris.

Your answers will help me determine what your comment meant. Let me know if you were thinking of someone other than Harris who that was and if your answers would be any different.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Making their constituents feel represented is a huge part of their job

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They will invent one. In a lab.

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 week ago
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

This was an AI clip Colbert made to make fun of JD Vance when JD Vance was trying to say that putting Hakeem Jeffries in an AI video with a sombrero wasn’t racist. The sombrero here is a callback to that original video.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's taco Tuesday my friend

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

It would only be like the fifth time hes changed his name

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Bowman/Kirk let's not let him forget his true last name.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

I’m finding this interesting—- I’ve heard two hypotheses around JD running for President—

1, he will divorce Usha, as she’s not Xian; and marry Erika….

2, Usha will convert

In my universe; #1 is ahead by a nose at this point. The Hug and this just keep adding to #1…

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

He's been propped up by others for his entire life. I wouldn't expect anything different.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He will never, ever make her cum.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Of course not! She's not a couch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago

Have you all said thank you lately?

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

JD Vance divorce/Remarriage incoming

I wonder who the bride will be

[–] III@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

She had her husband killed because he wouldn't back JD and Vance. Many people are saying it.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's keep funding it though and keep spending on all of our wants that we don't need. That way things will get worse!

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

How do we fix a cancer-ridden machine that we are all very much a party to?

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If only we had a kakistocracy. The current regime is a mixture of a pedophilocracy, felonocracy and kakistocracy, along with a few other unsavory ocracies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does DJT know Vance is running against him in 2028

[–] tangonov@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Until DJT goes full Putin, this is his last term

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man, when JD leaves Usha for Erika, the fireworks will be amazing to watch.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

He'll just get ICE Shanghai her..oopsie.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

She’s probably been banging the immigrant pool boy for years behind Charlie’s back, Vance isnt gonna cut it

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I heard she was sucking and fucking. And I heard she has a tattoo above The V that says "Nut Depository".

Degrading women is cool when it's people you don't like

[–] londos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is only because he thinks President's Day is the best day for couch sales.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is a distraction.

We should be concerned with Tucker Carlson and Candice Owens.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

She's gonna support him in every way she can, in and out of the bedroom.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lol they think they’re gonna follow up Trump with Vance?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm honestly surprised America doesn't have those suicide bomber we used to hear so much about after 911.

load more comments
view more: next ›