this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
427 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

9581 readers
2489 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title by Charlie K.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Facebook is a shit show. So many conservatives coming out of hiding. Easy blocks for those I've missed over the years.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry you still have to use it.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I do need to end that site. Need to download all my pictures and make a quiet exit

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't block them, they're a window into that side of things from people I actually know irl

but I sure am glad they make themselves known

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

One of my "friends" started posting all over responses from others about Charlie Kirk. So I def blocked her. Who knows what MAGA creep is stalking your pages but also has the ability to get you fired. Not worth it

[–] Charapaso@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Indeed, it's good to see what resonates with people who are actual humans and not just bots. Many have been quieter since all the Epstein backtracking, because they were sooooooo invested in it before.

And recently a dude I knew has two posts in a row that are incredible: one is literally cheering for the death of all the venezuelan people blown up in a boat (flag emojis and all), then the next post is him recounting how horrific it is that a political pundit was killed, and people cheering for death like that need to unfriend him. In the second post he is also going on about how Christian he and all these pundits are, which...bruh

There's no empathy for them, only love of the tribe.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

After a decade of him smugly smiling like "what are you going to do about it" every time he politely explained why others deserve to be treated as lessers, I'm confused why people are shocked an American shot him. He was even in a school

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's Steven Crowder, not Charlie Kirk.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kirk was on his "Change my Mind" tour sitting next to posters that had that phrase on it, when he delivered his final racist question.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Kirk's slogan was "Prove Me Wrong". The person in your meme is Steven Crowder, who is the "Change My Mind" meme person. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/steven-crowders-change-my-mind-campus-sign

Different people.

Also: https://lemmy.world/comment/19335650

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

I doubt most people referring to empathy as a justification truly understand or practice it. It often seems they mistake empathy for mercy toward whomever they consider unfortunate & still put people in categories.

Empathy isn't supposed to be convenient: the challenge of guiding choices by empathy is empathizing with everyone without reservation. It's not placing people in different categories of deserving & undeserving based on who they are, whether we agree with them, whether they'd reciprocate, their conduct, or anything.

As soon as someone makes such distinctions and defends them, they admit their position isn't strict empathy, either: they're following some consideration other than empathy. When I see the left & right disagree over empathy, it seems less over strict adherence to empathy (which neither seems to accept despite claims), and more over demanding the considerations their selective empathy follows (ie, reasons).

I'm not claiming we need to give the least deserving our empathy or that it's wrong to deviate from strict empathy. I am claiming, however, if we justify a conclusion from a premise of strict empathy yet clearly don't accept that premise, then our argument is unsound until we develop that justification into something more plausible.

While empathy isn't hard, people are extraordinarily bad at it.