this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
492 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27262 readers
2779 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Federal officers fired tear gas to disperse early-morning protesters as outrage mounted in Minneapolis over the killing of a 37-year-old woman in her vehicle.

It's time to treat ICE as the organized criminal organization that it is

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Obstruction of justice say what?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s all trump did in his first term, besides giving trillions to billionaires. Nothing happened.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

No they're Trump's puppets

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Without complete access to the evidence, witnesses and information collected, we cannot meet the investigative standards that Minnesota law and the public demand."

This is gaslighting by cowardly state officials. If you can get official records great. But they are not necessary. You have countless eye witnesses and multiple angles of video recording the murder. You don't refuse to prosecute gang hits because you don't have access to official cartel records. No different with ICE.

This is bullshit stonewalling by cowards in state office who are afraid to hold the powerful accountable.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I imagine without access to all to data, it can give the opportunity for the defense to call for a mistrial.

He's was also on 'official duty', so the administration is trying to push it out of MN's system by saying she was the aggressor who attempted to kill him. (If he was killed, it would be instantly out of MN's hands)

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I bet they threaten more politicians families. And they folded.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

There is going to have to be an investigation, arrest, trial, conviction and punishment. Failure to do any of these things is just going to be a powderkeg exploding. You see the video and it's clear she isn't trying to run him over. You see the video and it's clear she isn't a terrorist. You see the video and it's clear the agent was never in danger. This is state-sponsored murder by an unlawful posse. We reached the Duterte stage this quickly, less than one year from inauguration.

The bluechecks and bots on Twitter are just fascist accelerationists trying to make armed conflict happen as fast as possible to give cover for martial law and seize power. And that may be how it plays out. But they are literally out here killing innocent US citizens, and all of the deeply-embedded racism and xenophobia that lets Americans shrug at a brown person or an immigrant with a Latin-sounding name getting abused or killed, it's not here.

This is different and I don't think it's going away.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

We see because we value facts and evidence, seeking out information to gain an understanding of the situation before making judgements about it.

The dumbfucks who voted for this and continue to cheer it on don't. They appeal to authority, and when authority says to not believe the evidence of their eyes and ears, they cover them. If the regime says she was a "domestic terrorist" or radical leftist, they double down and blame the victim.

Her daylight murder will enrage and concern rational and reasonable people, but it won't do jack shit for the instigating bootlickers who voluntarily impede solidarity and justice.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think calling for armed conflict isn't accelerationist, it's already past the line where it should have happened and people are still sitting around thinking "if we just wait until the midterms and vote, things will work out".

It was too late last week, it is too late today, and by the time midterms come, if they come, fascism will have taken 100% hold and the US will be absolutely done.

As it stands now, even if things changed tomorrow, the US will take decades to recover from this - if it even can.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

it’s already past the line where it should have happened

Yeah, hand that gift to MAGA. The left seems to love doing that.

Trump is damaged by the Epstein stuff and the shit economy. We could use that to win mid terms next year and have the ability to check Trump. OR, we could stupidly run out into the street in a disorganized fashion and end up killing more innocent civilians than anyone else, giving Trump the excuse he needs to lock down society.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so don't use the evidence they aren't giving you and use what you can get. the public videos and statements from witnesses should be enough.

[–] londos@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Get dat unprotected Flock data

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have the PD arrest the dude.. oh wait ACAB

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hoisted by our own petard!

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't let them investigate either, if I was trying to cover up a murder.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

So stop investigating, take the material you have, which is enough to put the murderer into prison.

[–] HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the world's gov'ts that are trending authoritarian will get the data centers they need to sift thru everyone's internet history and kill/imprison/deport those who disagree with them politically. I have a hard time believing they won't go with the kill option bc it's more economic. So, bye!!! See ya next life!!!

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

It's the final solution

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What do you mean by "can't access the evidence"? Can someone send this MF a Lemmy link with the video?

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We did it ~~Reddit~~ Lemmy!

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They probably dont have access to the gun, brass, or maybe even bullets lodged in the victim or vehicle. Those, along with crime scene photographs, would usually be presented at trial.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They may not even have a positive id on the shooter, since they hide behind masks - they know what they’re doing is criminal

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

They mean the feds are keeping out the state/local police.

So they can cover it up.

[–] LemUser@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

So conduct your own investigation you twits.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Right, right, and, uh, what was that agent’s name agian? Uh, just so we know not to investigate it. (“*snkk* Shutup! shutup”)
Ah, yeah I got a pen. Go ahead.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

States’ rights!

(To murder innocent civilians).

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was trying to be clever, as in the state has a monopoly on violence.

Kinda missed though ngl.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Ah I see what you were going for, it’s a good joke