Wind is just infinitely cheaper than coal in every way. The scrubbers for sulfur alone in a 200 MW plant cost just to keep it from killing everyone and everything around are $400 million. A 2MW commercial wind turbine cost $4 million to install roughly $65k a year to maintain, which include admin, legal, leases, etc. so 200 MW of wind cost about the same as just the scrubbers in coal plant and $650k to maintain, vs Millions in maintenance in coal. Wind is not just greener, it is cheaper and better. The power source to turn the turbine is free!
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
154 points (100.0% liked)
politics
27262 readers
3060 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not that I'm disagreeing with your point, but $65k multiplied by a hundred is $6.5 million, not $650k
Yeah that is true…
Do you have the values on which these back-of-the-napkin calculations were based? As a natural sciences teacher, I'd love to discuss it with my students as an example.
Wind Turbine:
https://sigmaearth.com/cost-analysis-how-much-do-commercial-wind-turbines-really-cost/
Part of the Coal - ie scrubber costs
https://mostpolicyinitiative.org/science-note/cost-of-coal-power-plants/
Thank you!!
Wind has about a 30-40% capacity factor (varies by location) so maybe multiple by about 3 to get to the roughly 90-95% capacity factor of coal plants. Wind also requires a lot more regulation because it doesn't ramp up/down easily. Wind is cheaper than coal, but the math is way more complicated than what you're presenting.
Not really, have a friend who is inhouse counsel for bp, they are investigating heavy in wind and have been since 2009. The industry speaks for itself.
What's not really? Do YOU know anything about energy markets?
A little, handle oil and gas litigation in TX
But what about the birdsssssss
The whole thing about birds is propaganda. Look at how many birds are killed directly by pollution and indirectly by habitat destruction due to burning coal. It's a huge number compared to windmill strikes.
Also, look at other living things besides birds. Coal kills more in every case.
No no, SO many birds are killed by wind turbines and this is TOTALLY the most important social issue we need to solve
They're converting to natural gas at any rate. The facility just doesn't have coal to continue running because the plan all along was to shut down and convert. This order to stay open did fuck all except inject delays into bureaucracy.
burning natural gas is also carbon intensive
Holly shot! That’s awesome!