I disagree that a person with low IQ would think its possible to code using a simple text editor. If anything he needs IDE more than any one else.
Programmer Humor
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
Yeah, it doesn't fit the template but the low IQ version would be more like "You only need ChatGPT for coding."
Every self-taught programmer I've seen starts off hacking at something in Notepad.
Depends on where you start. When your first contact is HTML its not too unusual to use a text editor for development.
esp. if you started at the time when all you had for designing page layout were frames...
You can take away my auto complete, performance monitoring and all that jazz but you can't tell me a debugging system isn't absolutely essential if you actually want to finish a project in a reasonable amount of time
Why debugger when print?
Embedded systems 😁
That’s what a single red LED is for, right?
Is the single red LED solid, or is it flashing Morse for "please kill me"?
It depends on what you do, but generally I can't argue against a debugger.
gdb works great without an IDE, and many text editors have autocomplete.
Most text editors like vim/emacs/ect have ways of using a debugger.
I remember vim being a bit involved, but the performance was awesome.
But then if you put enough bells and whistles on text editors, do they become an ide?
But then if you put enough bells and whistles on text editors, do they become an ide?
Yes
Why do you need a text editor? Just use radiation to bit flip the memory into the configuration you need.
I have never seen or known a serious professional who preferred to work outside of a full featured IDE. All the most skilled and highest paid developers I've ever known were more adamant about using the IDE when compared to the less skilled developers who preferred to do things more via command line and text editors. Just my experience. I often suspect that this meme is shared and liked by people who aren't really professionals. Perhaps I just haven't encountered them yet.
Edit: It seems I indeed haven't encountered them! Although I do stand by my original point to the extent that it seems there are disciplines where IDEs are best and disciplines where they aren't. I enjoyed reading everyone's responses and thinking about areas of software that I don't usually think about. It's given me lots to look into. Thanks everyone who responded nicely!
On the contrary most people I know who "really know their shit" are using neovim and cli tools.
So, you've never known any Unix hackers? I worked for a student datacenter when I was at university, and we were mostly vim users; as far as text-editor diversity, we did have one guy who was into emacs and another who preferred nano. After that, I went to work at Google, where I continued to use vim. As far as fancy IDE features, I do use syntax highlighting and I know how to use the spell checker but I don't use autocomplete. I've heard of neovim but don't have a good reason to try it out yet; maybe next decade?
It's all variable, and highly dependent on the languages you use, the types of applications you develop, your personal workflows, what you learned with and got used to as you were learning to program, and a myriad of other factors. Painting in broad strokes, like what the meme is doing or what you're doing, is almost never correct. There's always nuance.
If you're in a jvm or Microsoft heavy environment then maybe so.
I know more than one person (I think 4, including me) who code for a living and essentially live in tmux.
Just for reference, because programming is not one big tent, as far as I know most people working professionally developing for the Linux kernel, gcc and glic uses only a text editor and "Unix as your IDE". I never tried myself but I have a feeling that any IDE with git integration would just immediately cry trying to interact with the kernel or gcc git repo. Even gits own PS1 status feature slows to crawl in this repos.
No one is going to take IntelliJ from me. Tab completion master race!
Lots of simpler editors gained tab completion support over the last few years, thanks to the LSP protocol. I have it in Kate, for example.
I dream of an alternate reality where everyone started using Kate instead of VSCode.
You don't even need a text editor, you can write it on paper.
But both are terrible options if you want to actually get stuff done, now that we have better tools.
Real men build their own toolchains.
Join the Vim cult! We have blackjack! And hookers!
(No guarantee of blackjack or hookers upon initiation).
Already joined the emacs cult. Youre too late.
Don't worry, cult membership is flexible.
You also need a compiler or interpreter because wtf man you gotta run some stuff during development
If you write C code in a text file and rename the file extension to .exe and try to run it the CPU will do something.
Joke's on you, with LSPs most text editors are full IDEs.
need ai integration to code
Nah that dude is on the left, and he makes 250k per year
These meme spreads misinformation under the disguise of wisdom.
Those on the right side are too blind in their arrogance and probably seldom face challenging tasks in large codebases.
just run everything thru Doom Emacs. Terminal? emacs, git? emacs, ide? emacs, WM? emacs.
Had some juniors who was git diffing in the terminal PRs of 20 more files with 200 changed lines. A newly appointed senior told them that was the best approach. Needless to say there had always to be some follow up push after they opened the PR on web. U dont need ai, but you need a fucking GUI.
