this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
300 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

11682 readers
5566 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • wants to get rid of poor people
  • only able to hire girls who are poor and vulnerable
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 months ago

Girls aren't people to them, so it fits.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't want to help people just get rid of them. Lust after a child. These are the good guys though. /s

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They have a lot of money so they have to be intelligent and virtuous

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They sure think they are.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

They're literally trying to recreate the handmaid's tale, except instead of fashionable robes everyone's gonna get Mormon pajamas.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I cannot think of a cartoon from my childhood where the people were this evil. All honesty, I think people need to be getting mad and considering how we get rid of rich people.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

how we get rid of rich people

🍽️

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course, from a zombie. :)

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Look, I support zombie rights to eat the rich, and I’m not ashamed to say it!

[–] pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

considering how we get rid of rich people.

I think the french considered that same problem around the 18th century... Come to think of it I'm almost certain they developed some kind of contraption for it.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

Might've been. Certainly worth a try.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Have we considered not buying their shit and maybe not voting them into power.

Sam Walton did a wonderful job of killing off most of the mom and pop stores, the internet did in the rest. The method of searching for the seller of Amazon to buy from them doesn't really work, a lot of store fronts use Amazon for storage. So unless you're good at farming, fabrication, injection molding, chip making, etc. you're stuck buying from a large corporation.

[–] Fusselwurm@feddit.org 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"getting rid of poor people" could charitably be interpreted as "getting rid of poverty" . I have questions about the part with the under-age girl though…

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 39 points 2 months ago

I wouldn’t be charitable with people who are excited about trafficking and raping children.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

It could be so easy, share your wealth then they're not anymore. But noo, we go the Dr. Evil route.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I hate that these fucks' names are redacted. They are actively discussing heinous shit, and getting away with it.

Another example: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00705860.pdf

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

By the way that redaction is a federal crime, too. Redacting the names of non-victims in these files was explicitly prohibited by the act that ordered their release. Fascists are screaming at us through their actions that liberalism and legalism will not, cannot prevent or restrain their barbarism. When's the world gonna listen?

[–] Denalduh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This one has been figured out https://lemmy.world/comment/21941826

It's Sultan Bin Sulayem.

[–] domdanial@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

That's not a smoking gun, that's a shitty chain email joke. It's slightly suspicious but I need more evidence than that.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Come one, they were just misled. Kids are using photoshop to look legal age.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Prostitution is legal in my country and there's this very well known escort website where you first have to figure out if a girl is 18+ from a single picture with filters.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They told us they were only redacting victims names and photos. But a lot of this emails… why names are redacted?

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Poor guys got diddled by kids (thoughts and prayers)

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

They consider their own monsters the "real victims"

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And once again it's not about Trump, though I'm sure he's in it with no less disgusting communications, pictures, maybe even moving pictures.

We already know that Jeffrey was a horrible human being.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t care if it’s about Trump or not. We already know he’s guilty. He’s proven himself to be a vile man ever since he entered the public light back in the fucking 70s.

These names need to be unredacted and the people attached need to be removed.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd like it to convince everyone else as well that he is a vile man.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

thanks, i couldnt fix it idk why

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Because of the space, I think. The responder translated it to its ASCII value so the link parser was able to parse it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

By taxing the rich and putting that money into social care.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who would make their products? Who would buy their products? What the fuck do they think is going to happen if all the poor people are gone?

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Servants (slaves) don't count as poor people. Cull the poors unless they volunteer to be servants.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Somebody has to make a website.

Where the quote from? Captain planet villain vs Epstein emails

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

Maybe they want to solve world poverty?

Probably not though.

[–] josephmbasile@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

More shit to FOIA

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Who is their friend shooting a feature?

Sounds like yet another pile of shite in the film industry that needs to get ousted.