this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
913 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

11157 readers
2051 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

I'll never understand why someone could actually want to put effort into dividing the American populace from the America military right now

Like, even if you don't know about how many non US citizens are in the US military...

It's seems obvious that the better plan would be getting military on the side of the populace and not the fascists rather than driving the military towards the fascists.

I've been trying to figure out a reason for a while, because these posts aren't uncommon.

But I can't come up with a reason that wouldn't be against civility rules if I posted it.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because you can never trust or rely on an ally who's on your side because you are being nice to them instead of because they have some kind of scruples.

It's no better than say, sucking up to someone with a peace award in the hopes they don't start a war.

This meme made me feel empathetic to those in the military, not divided.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Iraq war the way the Republicans (especially in the military) defended George W Bush and continued to support republicans after the as mind boggling.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Iraq wasn't just the GOP. Most Democratic leaders - including Hillary Clinton and Biden - supported and voted for it

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's seems obvious that the better plan would be getting military on the side of the citizens and not the fascists rather than driving the military towards the fascists.

That's the better plan, as long as they're willing to denounce American imperialism. If criticizing the imperialism they're cooperating with is enough to push them away, then they're less than worthless as an ally. Also some of us aren't American and don't care about the health of liberal democracy in your murderous neocolonial empire.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump already gutted most of the senior leadership in the American military that wouldn't dance to his tune. Plus the American military already has a bunch of right leaning uneducated idiots that are more than willing to 'just follow orders'.

I wouldn't expect anything much out of them honestly. Like most things what Americans portray and what they do is pretty different. It's just a couple steps away from calling themselves the Democratic Republic of America.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

It’s just a couple steps away from calling themselves the Democratic Republic of America.

They would NEVER call themselves anything that has the word 'Democrat' within it.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Americans wont be able to do shit regardless

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You can't think of anything they could do.

That's different and it's incredible naive for you to think the only things that could happen are the things you can think of.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More war in the sandbox coming soon

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not the poster, but I'm going to assume they say so because: "Middle East has lots of sand = sandbox" with the additional layer of meaning of "sandbox" as a place where children play and make stuff up, implying (perhaps) that the Middle East tends to be the place where the wealthy and powerful "play around," treating the people who live there (and the war machine they bring to it) as toys for their (sick) amusement. At least this is how I read it.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

Yes, I'm saying that using the term is obviously problematic as it has been used to devalue the space in dozens of countries and the lives of millions of people. This commenter made this comment as though they're critical of US imperialism but reproduced its enforced understanding of these regions.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›