this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
316 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28662 readers
2571 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

ICE Apes should be dispatched to assist our Freedom Fighters in Iran. Put them right up front, where the action is. They love that shit.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 2 points 25 minutes ago

And the media just keeps calling him "bold" and "decisive."

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 215 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

Normally this would end a Presidency within days of making remarks like that.

Nothing about this is normal.

Don't let them normalize this shit.

Join the next general strike or you'll be the next victim he can brag about or blame you for being a terrorist.

[–] totesmygoat@piefed.ca 23 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He still had vets and current military vote for him. After. He called them suckers and losers.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

That info didn't make it into their NewsMax/Facebook filter bubble. Even if it did manage to slip through via a relative or a coworker, it would have been too late, "fake news" or about those other people.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

The only way to stop it from normalizing is by stopping it from happening. People can't negate the normalizing process by sheer will.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 33 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

One atrocity can dissolve a government. But one atrocity every day can keep even the most hated and incompetent leader in power for a long time. While we‘re busy processing what has happened yesterday he already committed another unforgivable crime. And it goes on and on and on. He simply overwhelms the people with atrocities to the point everyone fights their own battle and debates which of the many crimes is worse and needs to be addressed.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 45 minutes ago

The head of the snake, and whatnot...

[–] null@lemmy.org 12 points 2 hours ago

That's been his style of political discourse forthis entire run. It's a neverending fountain of shit with some of it sticking to the wall.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 43 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I'll join the general strike that lasts for more than a day

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

I mean, join the one that lasts a day, too.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

They shouldn’t call them that. It’s just a walk out. Maybe it’s OK to call it a dress rehearsal or practice run but the point would be to test community support mechanisms and get the word out, not to “put the corpos on notice” or lend virtue to someone’s extra personal day. The truth is it’s not much of a stress test if it’s just 1 day. Also it’s crying wolf. General strikes should damage the economy and an extra snow day just doesn’t. It fails that goal even if it feels nice to say they participated in a “general strike.”

But the more insidious problem is one of logistics, tactics, and reserves.

With protests, there’s often rotating participation so overall support/resource/attention burnout isn’t a brick wall issue. People generally know how many protest days they have to give up front and using them up just means they’ll need to be replaced by another protestor. The point is showing up if you can.

But “1-day general strikes” steal actual person-days from the real general strike (a protracted war of attrition between workers and the economy where the workers hurt themselves to hurt their enemy). Meaning, it actually helps corporations not just by dis-carding useable cards in our deck prematurely_and_ revealing to the opponent our possible hands, it also subtracts drawable cards from our reserves since each of those person-days eventually must be borne by mutual support networks later on.

“1-day General Strikes” are not general strikes!

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

People are strengthened by working together and organizing community action at any scale, not weakened.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 14 minutes ago

I agree, but they should be active days, to get people plugged in, motivated, and should not be confused with general strike especially since a bunch of people already mistake general strikes as “boycotting work.” But everything I read says that’s a mistake, because those people end up scabs since they were allowed to think it was another paid holiday.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 hour ago

You'll need to settle for 2 hours on a random Saturday

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Resist and unsubscribe, if everyone did what they could, might be more effective.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

Also, go tax exempt.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 32 points 3 hours ago

Hey, all you American servicemen. All you ICE thugs, and everyone else with a gun who's doing stuff because this guy is telling you to do stuff. Note how he thinks of you. Why are you risking your life for him, again?

I mean, I probably know why you ICE thugs are doing it - you get to go beat up and kill brown people, something you've always wanted to do. But you're also cowards, so maybe consider that angle. He'll sacrifice you in a heartbeat.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 51 points 4 hours ago

What a fucking piece of shit

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 77 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck that draft dodger. He should send his kid to die over there.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 hours ago

No he should go there in person.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

Christ, what a fucking asshole.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

"We expect casualties with something like this," [Donald Trump] said. "We have three, but we expect casualties - but in the end it's going to be a great deal for the world."

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 37 minutes ago

Is there a betting pool on his Executive Order for a Draft? When there is, I got January 2027, right after the election, and after Christmas. You don't want this being the topic of discussion during the family get-togethers. Surprise them in the New Year.

Also, lots of loopholes for wealthy kids.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

So, follow me on this. Iraq’s population was actually initially happy saddam had been deposed. And that turned into a $16T, 15 year, million life quagmire. And Iraq is still a weak, uncooperative country. I can’t imagine taking over Iran, a country that hates us and accepts its leadership, with weapons systems orders of magnitude greater in number, and far more modern equipment.

There can be no good deal for the world. I feel like I’m listening to a car salesman, but he’s the president. He’s literally bribing the military industrial complex to keep himself in power post-term and selling it as a good thing. Uuuuugh.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

He's always taken advantage of greedy people. Its his super power, and he's got plenty of greedy people in America. The greedy people are okay with it because its what they would do if they had as much power as Trump.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like I’m listening to a car salesman

That's all this asshole ever was and ever will be, really. Guy made shitty real estate deals as a nepobaby failson and had a very big mouth. That's pretty much all he is.

Most of the people in NYC, and probably most of the people on the Eastern seaboard, tended to know who he was even by the early 90s. If they paid even the least bit of attention. But that stupid gameshow and that dumb book gave a whole lot of idiots the idea that he was really something more and somehow worthy of giving any power.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 23 minutes ago

This is it, 100% perfect. He was the poster boy for the blowhard business loser. By the early 90s, the NY times was reporting on investigations into money laundering schemes with Russian Oligarchs/mobsters.

His bank was Deutsche Bank, which was dubbed "the world's dirtiest bank" when investigations showed that their customers included corrupt business executives, dictators, terrorists, cartels, etc. He was traveling in rough circles by then, and it was well-known. His FBI file must have filled an entire cabinet, and that was in the early 90s.

So imagine Comey's and the FBI's reaction, years later, when this known criminal was getting closer and closer to the White House, and they see all that's going on with Russia and such? Trump has always characterized their investigations into him as spying, but they were doing exactly what they were supposed to do - investigate threats to national security.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

He bankrupted a casino TWICE.

[–] rogsson@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Accepts their leadership with a gun to their head you mean?

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Some yes, some no. They’re still a theocracy by popular decision, in spite of changing demographics. Last I checked, 60% happy, 40% unhappy

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I can't say "Fuck this guy" enough.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

I'll second that. Fuck this guy!

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

These “Trump Acts Like Trump” headlines are a lot better than the “Trump Does A New Crazy Thing” or “Trump Just Started A War He Promised For 15 Years That He Wouldn’t!!” headlines.

I am very grateful that he is, at 80 years old, too old to be constantly fucking insane 24/7 anymore. Clearly, he needs to take a break every once in a while.

So do I.

[–] Lawnman23@piefed.social 20 points 4 hours ago

JFC… 😯

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

I have to laugh because I know this won't phase his base.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

"We expect casualties with something like this," the president said. "We have three, but we expect casualties - but in the end it's going to be a great deal for the world."