this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
1324 points (97.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11028 readers
1425 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 6 points 1 day ago

I really appreciate people who notice things like these and bring it to light for everyone else.

Thank you.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

wait wut, the nyt (or any of our media rags) is a fucking propaganda pos? Is their a pikachu were he looks at you like you are fucking dumbass and he can believe you didnt know?

Today's lucky 10,000 would still benefit from learning about the media like this.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Whilst NYT might not be Nazi, this is just how they worked the majority of the German population at that time. It starts light.

[–] flamingleg@lemmy.ml 172 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

just in case anyone here doesn't already know, the death toll from the US-Israel bombing of the elementary girls school is currently at 164 with dozens more wounded. Victims are mostly little girls aged 9-12.

For some reason our western media seems reluctant to spread this basic factual information...

*edited US to US-Israel so that it's super duper accurate

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago

Because the administration involved in killing 100+ little girls are also involved in covering up a sex trafficking ring raping and molesting 100+ little girls.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Has there been any official statement as to why it was targetted?

Did they mistake it for something else, bad intelligence?

Did the missile malfunction?

I mean, I can imagine them doing it on purpose for some fucked up reason but they have to have an excuse, no?

[–] DeepSeaString@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't looked into it too much but I believe the school was near a military base and the rocket malfunctioned and went off course and hit the wrong target. 

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Despite being the least upvoted response, this is the actual answer - the school was directly next door to a military base

Schools and hospitals seem to be the factory default target for Israeli missiles

[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

It aligns with that the US and Israel are terrorist states. Aiming for targets which spreads the most fear and despair seems to be a part of their plan. Making parents reluctant to send their kids to school is an efficient way of imobolizing people.

It's an illegal war in the first place, so I wouldn't be surprised to see a continuous stream of war crimes going forward.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Israel is using the "they have underground facilities there, trust us" tactic again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It must be in their style guide that Israel is always good lol

[–] kingshrubb@lemmy.ml 77 points 2 days ago
[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The criticism raises a legitimate issue, but the cause is usually structural rather than intentional. News outlets often use phrases like “X says” when they cannot independently verify the information. That situation is more common with casualty reports from states where they have limited access. When the outlet has confirmation from sources it considers reliable, it will report the deaths directly. This creates a pattern that looks biased even though it often comes from verification constraints instead of design.

Iran’s reports are frequently treated with caution because the state tightly controls information, foreign journalists have restricted access, and strike sites cannot be independently examined. Casualty figures released by Iranian authorities have also been revised or withheld in past events. These conditions lower outside confidence in the accuracy of initial statements.

The first headline uses “Iran says” because the newspaper likely could not verify the reported casualties inside Iran, especially during a breaking event. The second headline states the deaths as fact because the information from Israel was independently confirmed. The result may look like a double standard, but it generally reflects what reporters can confirm at the time rather than an intentional bias.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The cause in this case is almost certainly intentional. The NYT has a documented history of publishing Israeli state propaganda as fact without any independent verification.

https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

It’s also not like Israel allows the press to operate freely. They actively suppress and censor reporters.

https://cpj.org/2025/12/under-the-radar-israel-steps-up-censorship-and-suppression-of-independent-reporting/

Worse, if they can’t censor a journalist then they’ll simply assassinate them and often murder their entire family.

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/un-human-rights-office-condemns-targeting-journalists-and-attacks-on-hospitals/

For the NYT, reporting an Israeli claim as fact in this way is journalistic malpractice. But what can we really expect from a paper that has been convincing US liberals that American war crimes are actually a good thing? They were even publishing articles in support of this war once it became clear what Trump’s intentions were.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Wasn’t Israel the country that has killed the most journalists in the world?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Maybe if it was a one-off instead of a consistent pattern for 30+ years.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wilson@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Given the loss of trust in media, if they want readers to give them the benefit of the doubt, they would need to cite their sources. I haven't ready either of these paywalled articles, but generally, they don't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know it's very, very cliche to mention Manufacturing Consent these days, but anyone who hasn't read it really should get ahold of a copy and at least read the first 2 or 3 chapters.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since Chomsky turned out to be Epstein's buddy and Michael Parenti died earlier this year, I'll shamelessly plug his book Inventing Reality: The Politics of News Media instead. However, I believe the good parts of Manufacturing Consent weren't even written by Chomsky, I'm not trying to disavow the book itself.

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I've never read the Parenti book. Thanks for the recommendation.

Pretty heartbreaking about Chomsky and Epstein. But, you're right about Manufacturing Consent. Actually, Chomsky wasn't much more than an editor. All of the key concepts and the methodology were Herman's. Sure, the book wouldn't have been so popular without Chomsky's participation, but Herman could have written the book on his own, no question.

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never heard of it. Tell me why?

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Like its title suggests, it delves into the ways in which popular consent is manufactured via the media (at the time - 1988 - mostly print, radio, and television). It's thoroughly convincing and is that rare type of book that can discuss research without alienating casual readers. Highly recommended.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

It's pretty easy to determine the one who shot that missile into Israel. It is not as clear who blew up the school in Iran, and the headline would be quite uncertain to state "either American or Israeli".

Additionally, it is relatively easy for the NYT to verify the news in Israel, so it is not a "claim", whereas they cannot easily verify the news in Iran.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Dozens killed in strike on Iranian girl's school.

Then the next line mentions uncertainty as to whether or not it was Israel or the US, but it was clearly one of them.

The NYT can verify that 'dozens were killed' there just as easily as in the other story.

I have no idea why you don't think they have access to Reuters or the AP, who both verified that part quite quickly.

https://apnews.com/video/all-girls-school-in-iran-struck-by-us-israeli-strike-over-100-casualties-78cead1fc4ba4ac39d57e8a0f53b0bf2

https://www.reuters.com/video/watch/idRW953528022026RP1/

Oh hey look, Reuters basically came up with the same headline that I did.

Except that they also attribute blame to Israel.

In summary, you're completely wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

How is it easy to verify claims in Israel when they lockdown areas, censor their own media, and assassinate journalists and their families who report on Israeli genocide? Israel does not have a more free press than Iran does.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Neither Israel nor the US took credit for the strike that hit the school so this could be a matter of genuinely not knowing which of the two was responsible.

The US military's Central Command (Centcom) said it was looking into reports of the incident, while Israel's military said it was "not aware" of any IDF operations in the area.

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know the people in charge are beyond incompetent but I imagine that the US military knows exactly where every last one of their 6-7 figure missiles went. That doesn't mean we ever will.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Someone knows which missile it was. They don't just mix in missiles on the same target, it was either an Israeli strike or an American, and whoever fired it knows.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 15 points 2 days ago

I hadn't seen those responses yet, but I'd say the gap between those two messages makes it fairly clear this was an American missile.

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 28 points 2 days ago (20 children)

Looking at the comments here, even here in the Fediverse, it's quite easy to understand how the US regime is possible despite its completely obvious depravity.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Reminds me of a thread on Reddit of photos of Israeli missiles stuck in civilian buildings (apartment blocks). People asking where it was from and not one comment stating it was a Syrian city and where the missiles came from.
Treat everything you see as unconfirmed, no mater if it is for or against your beliefs. Manipulation is everywhere.

[–] raker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Same here: https://lemmy.world/post/43760793

US fighter jets "crashed", " falling from the sky" and "collision". Pure framing bullshit! Like they were out of fuel or something.

Kuwait blasted them! By accident. That was already confirmed and stated.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago

But but but MBFC rates them as highly factual and left-center bias!! How could they ever do a war hawk??

-the most credulous jackasses on the planet

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

They don't need to be when they have the support of the moneyed interests all they care about is profit.

[–] denaggels@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Iran doesn't allow any information out of the country besides their own state controlled media.

There are lots of reporters in Israel from all over the world that can verify or falsify stuff happening there.

Not to say there isn't any farming happening, but this example doesn't work for showing that.

load more comments
view more: next ›