this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
445 points (99.8% liked)

politics

28782 readers
3139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whether it was due to the early hour of the day or just to the blood-thirsty nature of the moment, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared particularly unhinged during the first official news ...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 168 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Fun fact: the last head of state who launched a war without rules of engagement was Adolf Hitler.

[–] eddanja@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] three@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

F is for fire that burns down the whole town!

U is for uranium... bombs!

N is for no survivors

[–] jim_v@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Planktonnn! That's not what fun is about!

[–] f314@lemmy.world 143 points 4 days ago (3 children)

No stupid rules of engagement

This sounds like a great way to get your planes shot down by allies!

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

friendly fire ain’t gonna fire itself

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Let's see if it happens three times, just to be sure.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 79 points 3 days ago

Rules of engagement are literally how you define the difference between a civilian and an enemy combatant.

"No rules of engagement" is military lingo for "yes to all the war crimes."

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 78 points 3 days ago (15 children)

No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically correct wars.

No democracy, no nation building. So what is the actual goal here? Just to shoot stuff for its own sake?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 63 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Now I'm hearing that the commanders all gave their troops a speech about doing this for God and Christianity, etc., so it seems like the primary motivation was to kick off the End Times for the religious freaks.

So we're in it until The Rapture. Our entire world has to burn down to satisfy the fantasies of delusional religious weirdos, so the Sociopathic Oligarchs can comb through the rubble for treasure.

How about we just Rapture the entire MAGA leadership, and move on?

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I am an atheist, but if heaven and hell exist, they should know, there is enough space in hell for them.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

No god worth worshipping would condone their actions. I stand by the wisdom of Marcus Aurelius, that I will live a moral life and reject any god that has a problem with it. Killing to kill is the mandate of an evil god.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

I understand. Whenever one of these psychopaths assume room temperature, I'm always slightly sad that I don't believe in their mythology.

When Dick Cheney croaked, I remember thinking that it would be really nice to be able to smile at the thought of him having his Welcome Orientation in Hell. Instead, I was just sad for the person who didn't get a heart because Cheney took it.

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 5 points 3 days ago

Call it whatever you want...just...make them stop...

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Democracy" and "nation building" is just "occupation" by another name. So I guess we can take some comfort in that not being their goal?

[–] duncan_bayne@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sometimes. It can be done honorably and with good outcomes; Japan and Germany post-WW2 are good examples.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Those are the good examples, and they worked very well. But ever since, the US seems to think they can replicate the effect by going in, bombing the place, shooting some locals, and declaring mission accomplished.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masta_chief@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

I have a feeling it's as simple as wanting to use all the toys they've spent trillions on over the years and just want to see big explosions and play war.

Imagine if our society provided taxpayer funded paintball/airsoft/bomb ranges so all these warmongers can get their rocks off without hurting people.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

He just wasn’t getting that same high exploding South American fishermen anymore.

Tolerance is a hell of a drug.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The goal is not to make Bush's mistake of setting a goal that they can later be held accountable to.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So just shoot the place up, see what comes out, and then declare that that was the goal all along.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 86 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Whether it was due to the early hour of the day or just to the blood-thirsty nature of the moment, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared particularly unhinged during the first official news briefing about President Donald Trump’s attacks on Iran.

are they implying he was still drunk from the night before? 🤫

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think a big part no one talks about, is all these old men are on gender affirming hormone care because their physical identity doesn't match their mental identity.

They want to be 20 again, so they're shooting up enough testorone that they have the logic and critical thinking of a 20 year old.

The alcoholism isn't helping, but that's not where the bloodlust is coming from.

I've had a couple friends try, and I honestly don't know why anyone over 40 would ever want to feel 20 again. They all love if for like 6-12 months, before they realize acting like they're 20 again isn't a good thing and it's fucking their lives up.

When the people running the country are on it, they're fucking all our lives up, the alcoholism is why Hegsworth can't come that realization on his own, or listen to anyone telling him.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

T shouldn't impact their logic or critical thinking, but it will impact their emotional regulation and impulse control. At least based on my experience with trans guys. And anecdotally when I started E I had about a year or so of getting into stupid fights with my mom despite knowing better before my body adjusted. Getting back to the right amount would probably calm them down, but these guys are more juiced up than a bodybuilder who can't do math. They're probably also being tilted by their grapes turning to raisins from that.

But yeah it's a drunken roid rage by a man who simply refused to mature or develop logic or critical thinking since their teens. And I think that's a bigger component to his inability to see than the T or the hooch. These men never grew the fuck up, and as such rather than living a good life at each stage, seeking to grow and mature until it is time to return to the earth, they strive to live a life eternally young and foolish, unable to even see that their unhappiness stems from this lifestyle.

And yeah, don't get me wrong, I miss feeling young, but hormonal instability wasn't fun either time. I like having stable emotions that can be reasonably controlled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, maybe putting an alcoholic psychopath in charge of the armed forces wasn't a great idea.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I got some news about military leadership for the last 500 years.

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 66 points 4 days ago

people who should be spending decades in prison are instead starting wars with the rest of the world

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago

He got torn apart by Trump behind closed doors and now he's overcompensating for his failures by being even more abusive than usual to try and salvage this and win daddy Trump's approval again. Because conservatives think hitting harder and being less empathetic is obviously the solution and since Trump is a raging narcissist and has zero empathy, the standard for what's acceptable is anything that doesn't harm Trump. Why would anyone think Trump, the racist, serial child rapist, would give a fuck about some brown children getting blown apart?

[–] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 59 points 4 days ago (6 children)

People dunk on Pete about alcohol because he’s been drunk at inappropriate times in the past, but I think they basically ignore the fact that he probably does a ton of blow too.

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Definitely. He has to be sharp and focused while making terrible decisions.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Is that why we're shooting down our own F-15s? His ROE is just "if you see something, shoot something?"

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

no nation-building quagmire

Surely this is how you build the next generation of aggrieved suicide bombers?

Oh, and create an absolutely massive migrant problem.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For whom?

Europe most probably. This will strenghten right wing parties and weaken thr union... win-win. While the majority of EU is licking US boots after they started a war of agression against a sovereign nation with little to no justification of any kind... I'm tired Boss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 18 points 3 days ago

He’s not high. He’s drunk.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Is that him admitting to bombing those girls?

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 5 points 3 days ago

Send this absolute fucking shithawk to The Hague.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Netanyahu and trump are Mussolini and Hitler 2.0

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

So their plan to cheat the election is sending the troops to die in Iran, so they can't even coup that fucking orange pedophile...

[–] unnamed1@feddit.org 17 points 4 days ago (8 children)

This is how Call of Duty receives new content. Too bad the Americans are the villains now :/

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My favorite was "no more politically correct wars"...... So I guess the only option moving forward is politically incorrect wars? I don't think I can keep up with the Machiavellian minds of this 4d chess administration.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Macciavellian? Are you serious? Macchiavelli said you can be a cruel asshole, but the one thing you cannot be is unpredictable. Old Mac would have given this US government a 2/10 score.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 13 points 4 days ago

Ergh these plebs trying tell hegseth how to fight wars, he was totally great at wars which is why his whole career was totally in the military, except for that time he left for a while because all those stupid generals wouldn't listen to his great ideas, well now look who has to listen to who huh?!

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

fox news host drama. ad lib

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›